Mike Lindell Thinks ‘Every Person In The World’ Will Be Talking About His Multi-Day Thanksgiving ‘Marathon’ To Overturn The 2020 Election

UPROXX ^ | October 25, 2021 | Josh Kurp

[MayflowerMadam]

Thank you! Agree 100%.

[Dr. Franklin]

No doubt the same big money controls both parties. I hope you're right that most people are getting that.

I keep working on my leftist friends. What was the first thing the Bidet Regime did? Did the Dems fix the student loan problem, or just flood the country with illegals? What's the most important thing on their agenda, tax fairness or forcing people to get an experimental gene therapy masquerading as a "vaccine"? "Winning" an election should mean that the base of the party in power should get things they want. When that doesn't happen, people should ask "why". When the elections are rigged, the rulers don't really care about rewarding their voters because they don't really matter.

[McGruff]

I always like to check out the authors for bias:

Josh Kurp

Josh is the senior pop culture editor and spends most of his day watching movies, watching television shows, writing about movies and television shows, and making obscure references to the movies and television shows he watches then writes about.

[Louis Foxwell]

Wait a minute. Who are you anyway? Kazoo?

[cgbg]

Yup—this is like demanding that bank robbers return the loot to the banks.

They are gonna laugh at you from their hide-outs....and proudly proclaim to anyone that asks:

I dindu nothink!

[Dr. Franklin]

I always like to check out the authors for bias:
Josh Kurp
Josh is the senior pop culture editor and spends most of his day watching movies, watching television shows, writing about movies and television shows, and making obscure references to the movies and television shows he watches then writes about.

Well, maybe so, but Kurp wrote a less biased report of Lindell's news than Salon, which is banned on FR.

[Reily]

Uh huh ok

[higgmeister]

Bob Barr or Bill Barr?   You mention Attorneys General of the United States, Merrick Garland and Bill Barr, but Mike Lindell is referring to the Attorneys General of individual states.   Did you mean to mix them up like that?

[Dr. Franklin]

I think there are more than five, but they don’t want their names released until filing is done. Probably they fear for their lives, and rightfully so.

There are 26 Republican AGs:
https://republicanags.com/ags/
The question really is which RINOs aren't supporting the petition for writ of quo warranto? The Texas v. Pennsylvania case offers some clues as to who the RINOs are:
Brief of State of Missouri and 16 Other States as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint
GA's Republican AG Chris Carr actually opposed Texas's efforts to clean up the massive fraud in GA, and several Republican AGs did nothing.

[Dr. Franklin]

Bob Barr or Bill Barr?

Bill Barr is such a treacherous Bush family POS that he is easy to forget. He should be impeached for dereliction of duty and failing to guarantee a Republican form of government as required by the U.S. Constitution.

[higgmeister]

Roger that!

[Carriage Hill]

I have 4 of his queen-sized myPillows.

[stuck_in_new_orleans]

Is he back on drugs? Sounds like it

[MayflowerMadam]

“Is he back on drugs?”

I don’t think he’s on pharma drugs. But he does have an addictive personality. I think this effort of finding the truth about the election might be his current drug of choice.

Maybe folks said that about all the people who changed the world and were single-minded about their respective causes. Founding Fathers, Lech Wałęsa, etc.

I support him 100%.

[Dr. Franklin]

Is he back on drugs? Sounds like it

Are you? Why do you think that? Because the man is doing something about a fraudulent election?

[Maris Crane]

I love your optimism and I love that you sound like you don’t cave, because “caving” is SO COOL.

The negativism is depressing, so I try not to read it.

Some posters have a “cut and paste” mentality and over, and over, and over again repeat their “intellectually superior” opinions of ...nothingburger, ho hum, call me when...,and you know what...IT GETS OLD.

Stay with your opinions and thoughts because those of us who feel as I do...THIS IS NOT OVER...IT IS ONLY DELAYED!

Thank you for your measured optimism.

I sure appreciate you.

[stuck_in_new_orleans]

Because he sounds insane

[higgmeister]

There is no precedence for so called "overturning the Presidential election."   It isn't in the Constitution.   It cannot be done.   Something must be done but not that.

“America is at that awkward stage; it's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards.” — Claire Wolfe

[Fury]

1) I never lied about my Cyber Symposium stream being hacked when it was my own team's incompetence.

Yes, was pretty bad when "Col". Phillip Waldron announcing on Day 3 that there had a security breach of the "data streams":

"Mike and Phil are not able to release the promised packet captures due to “finding a credible threat within the data streams, a poison pill inserted into the data”, and not wanting to release that to the public"

-see https://electionfraud20.org/in-detail/cyber-symposium-mike-lindell/#day-3-summary

So, Lindell and Waldron had incredibly poor OPSEC over the packet captures they possessed. BTW, no further updates on what occurred.

4) I never lied about having network packet captures after promising to present them at my Cyber Symposium.

One attendee documented the three day event, specifically, the eventual failure to provide the packet captures:

- see https://twitter.com/ErrataRob/status/1425283795364818946

And, according to some one poster on FR, only the people at the Symposium know for sure about the packet captures. People that were not there cannot comment authoritatively on the packet captures - that's what Dr. Franklin was alluding to earlier this year. Even through three people who attended the Symposium all stated that they were not provided the packet captures to analyze.

I believe Lindell to be a good man. But I also believe that he has been used by the likes of Mary Fannnig, "Col". Phillip Waldron, Dennis Montgomery, etc. The result is an event which failed to produce what Lindell promised.

The fact that this thread has not even made it to 100 posts is a potential sign that more and more people consider Lindell to not be a credible source regarding election fraud claims.

[Dr. Franklin]

There is no precedence for so called "overturning the Presidential election." It isn't in the Constitution. It cannot be done. Something must be done but not that.

Uh, so where do we find a right to have abortions in the U.S. Constitution? At common law having children our of wedlock was the crime of bastardy. So, that's a real head scratcher. Oh, and while we are at it, where does the U.S. Constitution state that homosexual have the right to get married contrary to thousands of years of human history? Polygamy has a stronger argument based on history and acceptance by other cultures.

"It can't be done" is a quitter's motto. Because an election was never known to have been successfully hacked by a conspiracy of foreigners and Big Tech doesn't mean that nothing can be done once it is proved to have happened. The strength of the common law system is its flexibility. It readily adapts to new problems, and fashions remedies, far better than the rigid civil code systems. If the case is made, we should expect SCOTUS to act.