Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Paladin2; SoConPubbie
Actually, I believe prescribed burns are the appropriate manner of forestry to prevent really bad, out of control wildfires. I believe even Trump mentioned as much.

The local Ohlone tribe did their own type of controlled burns. It also helped them monitor grizzly bears better.

Fires are even part of the reproductive cycle of nearby redwoods. Prescribed burns help limit the fire fuel, so that fires don't get too hot, which is bad for redwoods.

7 posted on 10/27/2021 3:29:41 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: nickcarraway

There are more expensive ways to reduce forest fuel [focused on ground fuel].

In my nearby NF they have both proscribed burns and then thinning operations of young trees & significant tree harvesting of mature trees.

The thinning ops of non-timber trees looks to be expensive.

In addition there is the possibility of mowing, which I should be doing on my lot but haven’t in areas away from the house.


11 posted on 10/27/2021 3:39:28 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Critical Marx Theory is The SOLUTION....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Depends on the topography and the vegetative type and also whether or not it has been done on a regular basis.

The Indians did it best in the Eastern US forest lands.

They kept the lower vegetation under control and allowed for the wildlife to flourish and created a great hunting habitat as a result.


18 posted on 10/27/2021 4:05:47 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson