Death Factor = ratio of Vaccinated deaths per 100k against Unvaccinated deaths per 100kPosted on 10/27/2021 2:04:24 PM PDT by ransomnote
Raw Covid-19 Mortality and All Cause Mortality Data from the UK Office of National Statistics (ONS) has revealed that double vaccinated people were six times more likely to die of All Causes than unvaccinated people from the end of April to the beginning of July 2021.
This is the first time the government has published data which traps the scale of the lethal side effects of the Covid-19 injections.
By a concerned reader
The data can be downloaded from the ONS in Excel format here.
Death Factor = ratio of Vaccinated deaths per 100k against Unvaccinated deaths per 100kIn table 4 and 5 of the report, the ONS calculated the death rates per 100k using the complicated age standardised mortality rate formula explained in their report.
This is supposed to remove age as a confounding factor in the table above, but they do not supply the raw data by age band for the age bands they use in their formula. So one cannot check vital aspects of the formula.
Therefore a decision was made to just to use the raw data published above and calculate the death rates per 100k by dividing the death numbers by the population and multiplying by 100,000. We used excel for the calculation since the ONS supplies all the data in excel format.
For the avoidance of doubt –
The Unvaccinated Covid Deaths per 100k in Column11 = 100,000 x Column3/Column6
The Unvaccinated All Cause Deaths per 100k in Column14 = 100,000 x Column5/Column6
The Vaccinated Covid Deaths per 100k in Column 12 = 100,000 x Column7/Column10
The Vaccinated All Cause Deaths per 100k in Column 15 = 100,000 x Column9/Column10
The Vaccine Efficiency as measured by Covid-19 deaths is Column13 = (Column11 – Column12)/the larger of the two columns as a %
The Vaccine Efficiency as measured by all cause deaths is Column16 = (Column14 – Column15)/the larger of the two columns as a %
The Death Factor is simply the ratio of the Vaccinated all cause death rate per 100k to the Unvaccinated
The figures are astonishingly revealing. Using the normalised absolute ratio of Covid deaths between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated in column 13 we see clearly that the vaccines were initially 97% effective against the alleged original Covid-19 variant as claimed by Pfizer and Moderna.
But by April their effectiveness in preventing Covid deaths had all but vanished from the raw data, being hidden to some extent by the age differential between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. Thereafter, thankfully, the death numbers (from Covid itself) have been pretty low both for the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. So all we see is noise around the zero.
There is perhaps a slight discernable advantage to the vaccines as the age differential runs out towards July. However nothing spectacular is seen there.
But when we look at all cause mortality we at last get some idea of the damage done by the gene therapy aspect of these injections.
The overall death rates among the double vaccinated per 100k were around 6 x higher than in the unvaccinated from the end of April until the start of July 2021. These death rates include all the deaths caused by side effects which have not necessarily been clinically attributed to the vaccines.
This is the first data published that manages to capture that figure. During the start of that period it is true that double vaccinated people were on average a lot older than unvaccinated people. So the death rates would be expected to be higher in the vaccinated group.
But all adults in the UK over 18 were called for their first shot by June 18th, at which time the recommended period between shots had been reduced to 8 weeks. So all adults had been called for a 2nd shot by August 13th. So by the end of September the age differential between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated would have been negligible.
But if we extrapolate the non age adjusted death factor figures forward by 12 weeks to September 24th (week 38), they will plainly still be very much in the red and certainly be above 3.
By week 26, 71% of the total population was double vaccinated. So most of the job was done, given that 8-9% are never going to be vaccinated So this data drives a coach and horses through the concept that vaccines save lives. They do not. Quite the reverse in fact. They make people more likely to be infected with delta and more likely to die.
A further analysis of this data has been performed by Profs Norman Fenton and Martin Neil and can be viewed here.
Fixed it for the whiner.
And, I don’t think this is the first time s/he/it has cried, like this. Seems so familiar.
I am saying that the linked website (theexpose.UK) is deliberately cherry picking, and misinterpreting data, to falsify anti-vaccine conclusions.
Every article they print.
Do,3% chance of dying IF you get the virus?
SO,3% chance of dying IF you get the virus?
“why is the CDC in the US claiming the exact opposite - that the vaccinated are actually dying LESS from all causes than the unvaccinated?”
Because they, and any other source (such as peer reviewed academic journals) that uses sound data analysis, will control for obvious confounding variables - like the difference in age between the vaccinated and unvaccinated. Apples to apples comparisons of similar populations (age and co-morbidities) consistently show a vaccine protective effect, all over the world.
This website (theexpose.uk) is deliberate disinformation - every article.
That’s molecularly impossible. The vaccine does not suppress the natural immune system. Both the natural and the vaccine primed immune system behave like a hybrid electric car. Both would work as a super immune team with a big H on their chest!
How much of a f’ing retard does one have to be to still be defending these clot shots…and the CDC at this point? Fourth injection anyone??
-—> Because they, and any other source (such as peer reviewed academic journals) that uses sound data analysis, will control for obvious confounding variables - like the difference in age between the vaccinated and unvaccinated.
Say what? Here’s one of the articles on the CDC claim I mentioned, that doesn’t differentiate for age, either, so we are talking apples to apples:
People vaccinated against Covid-19 less likely to die from any cause, study finds
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4006277/posts
Yet you claimed the study in THIS thread - showing that vaccinated people were more likely to die - was inaccurate.
So, which is it?
Is the CDC study bogus?
Or are you going to change you position and claim THIS study is now bogus, and you were incorrect in your earlier claim?
Can’t have it both ways.
Allow me to state Golden Eagle’s point in a different way:
You FRvaxxers are aiding and abetting the greatest internal threat to liberty (and the economy) in US history: the vaxx mandate. Every article and argument we post against vaccines is directed against the mandates. (Get the jab if you want - no one cares.)
SO the point is: given the data in this paper, why have any vaccine mandate whatsoever, with data like this showing that THE UNVACCINATED ARE NOT DYING.
The author of this article, “a concerned reader” is a welder in England, Jonathan Allen-Walker of Scunthorpe, Lincolnshire.
https://www.logically.ai/articles/actors-behind-uk-misinformation-site-the-daily-expose
Liberals use lies to get what they.
Conservatives believe in the truth (or used to).
I'm against the mandates and am not taking the vaxx.
Yet this article is still lies.
So it’s the formula you don’t like? Or the data source?
Let’s start with the source, which is the raw data. But I draw your attention to row 19, which shows roughly an equivalent number of vaxxed and unvaxxed to compare:
Again, row 19:
UNVAXXED
Population - 14,401,995
Covid Deaths - 19
Non-Covid Deaths - 578
VAXXED
Population - 14,347,609
Covid Deaths - 18
Non-Covid Deaths - 4,626
So let’s just keep the formula simple, such as 4,626 / 578 = 8.003
Hmm.
THE FACTS: Articles that have amassed thousands of views across social media this week of August 26, 2021, misrepresent a June study from Britain’s Francis Crick Institute, which looked at the ability of COVID-19 vaccines to produce neutralizing antibodies against viral variants i.e. the Delta variant.
The articles claim that the study shows the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine “destroys T cells” and “weakens the immune system.”
But that’s not at all what the research shows, according to the Francis Crick Institute’s Dr. David Bauer, one of the study’s authors.
“Our work to date has not studied T cells at all,” Bauer told the AP in an email. “All research published to date shows that the Pfizer (and other) vaccines generate a strong, positive, protective T-cell response against SARS-CoV-2.”
Outside experts confirmed that the COVID-19 vaccines don’t destroy or damage T cells.
“There’s a lot of data that shows that the vaccines induce strong T cell responses that recognize the virus and probably lead to protection,” said Dr. Joel Blankson, a professor of medicine at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine who has personally studied T cell responses to COVID-19 vaccines.
“There is no evidence that any SARS-CoV-2 vaccine destroys any pre-existing T cells, rather the truth is the opposite,” said Dr. Grant McFadden, director of the Biodesign Center for Immunotherapy, Vaccines and Virotherapy at Arizona State University. “The vaccines all create new T cells that together with the antibodies all help to protect us from the COVID disease.”
Stay the course.
You know what I mean.....
So HG, What day of the week does your paycheck from Phizer/Moderna/Johnson and Johnson come in?
Sincere question.....
Poor little qwerty, she’s got her panties in a bunch.
You are nothing but a pro-vaccine propagandist who demands the mods pull any and all information against vaccines.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
