Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: albie
Whoever holds the gun is “responsible” for checking the gun and it’s safety.

It is not that simple. And when it comes to actors in a movie production, that statement is specifically false.

Movie scenes often require firearms to be pointed at other people or at the camera. Such conditions are inherently dangerous.

Actors are assumed to be incompetent at handling firearms safely. For most actors, that is an accurate assumption.

The movie industry has very specific rules, procedures, and job assignments to deal with this. Those procedures and rules work very well - if they are followed.

In this case, the required procedures were not being followed - to a point that may be assessed as criminal negligence.

68 posted on 10/25/2021 1:13:12 PM PDT by flamberge (Everybody knows that the dice are loaded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: flamberge

albie: Whoever holds the gun is “responsible” for checking the gun and it’s safety.


You: It is not that simple. And when it comes to actors in a movie production, that statement is specifically false.

Movie scenes often require firearms to be pointed at other people or at the camera. Such conditions are inherently dangerous.


1. Actors are required to check the gun.

2. Movie scenes almost NEVER require firearms to be pointed at people.


75 posted on 10/25/2021 1:18:37 PM PDT by TexasGator (UF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson