Correct, but there’s nothing wrong with using a cheap home-administered PCR test as a screening tool to tell you there is SOME kind of viral disease process going on, and THEN testing the person with a COVID-19 antibody test to confirm/deny that’s what it is.
This is how NHS has used them in the UK and a friend’s family has found the PRC to be 100% accurate in proactively identifying the need for antibody testing that has confirmed COVID was in fact present.
People act like this is all new stuff when in fact PCR tests have proven to be effective and are well established in the medical art.
said,
"tell you there is SOME kind of viral disease process going on" Why do they look for viral disease when it's not the antigen of covid? They're looking for a bacteria when they say they don't know if it is bacteria. Another issue people are not getting bacterial pneumonia they're getting pulmonary edema from the spike protein
Let me help you.
William N Voss paper shown they use nineteen different epitope (smallest form of an antigen) the reason they don't use ONE is because they said they don't know what covid is. The pseudovirus they use in the mRNA injections are for bacteria when covid antigen isn't a bacteria.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33947773/