Posted on 10/25/2021 11:21:30 AM PDT by ransomnote
[H/T Ymani Cricket]
Dr. Tom Cowan: The PCR Tests Are Being Replaced with Something EVEN WORSE! (bitchute.com)
In the FIRST 20 MINUTES of this video Tom Cowan explains why the PCR tests are total BS and the plan to replace them with something even WORSE! "There are no 'False Positives' and/or 'False Negatives' - the entire basis of the tests is false." After 20 minutes, Cowan answers questions submitted to his weekly Q&A - topis include:
- Melatonin
- Delta Variant & increased cases
- Vaccines
- Neurotransmitters
- Vaccine shedding
- Appendix rupture
- Holistic diet & healing
- Being mindful of where your food comes from
- Cataracts
- NYC Vaccine Passports
- Education
Thirteenth Amendment is irrelevant to your assertion that court rulings legitimize government actions.
The name “Dred Scott” mean anything to you?
DuncanWaring wrote: “Thirteenth Amendment is irrelevant to your assertion that court rulings legitimize government actions.”
Perhaps but that wasn’t my point which was it took over 80 years and a civil war to ‘outlaw’ slavery. You may have to wait a long time for the courts to support your wishes about the vaccines.
DuncanWaring wrote: “How about all the fully-licensed quacks who are killing hundreds of thousands of people every year pushing high-carb/low-fat diets that caused an explosion of obesity, high blood pressure, and Type II diabetes?”
Why not stick to the topic of whether Tom Cowan is a suitable source of medical advice?
No. Reasons I believe are laziness, ability to remove a video if problems arise because of their claims, lack of confidence in their claims, etc.
At the very least include a written article to go with a video, etc.
Another reason is that videos can be better purveyors of fear, uncertainty and doubt. Use of “scary” music, clips of “scary” events, etc, can all be used to push the narrative of a video.
I believe the OP to which you responded was alluding to being forced to take a COVID-19 vaccine against one’s will. At least that’s how I read it.
That’s incorrect, and a common bit of disinformation that circulates around FR.
-see https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-who-pcr-idUSL1N2M10ID
Why not answer the question of “Is he really any worse than the rest of the quacks out there?”.
You may have to wait a long time for the courts to support your wishes about the vaccines.
But that doesn’t make them right.
It only means that it takes a very long time and a large number of corpses before their error is reversed.
By the way, did the Supreme Court ever formally admit that Scot vs. Sandford was wrongly decided?
Fury wrote: “I believe the OP to which you responded was alluding to being forced to take a COVID-19 vaccine against one’s will. At least that’s how I read it.”
Not exactly, OP claimed: “I and all others have a right to say no.” (to the vaccines). My response was: “No, it isn’t your right. Seventeen courts have ruled the COVID mandates are enforceable.”, ie, such a right does not exist.
If you’re intent is to stop the mandated vaccinations, it does no good to claim non-existent rights. Base your opposition on facts, not what you wish were true.
Nor are the conspiracy theories floated here useful. Only the true-believe anti-vaxxers will believe that the vaccines are a bio-weapon developed by Bill Gates to decimate the world’s population, that the virus is the caused by 5G wireless, that all those who’ve taken the vaccines will die within months, or that those advocating vaccination will face trials for crimes against humanity, ie, Nuremburg 2.0.
And, BTW, the Nuremburg code has not been enacted into US code by either legislation or treaty despite what has been claimed on this board.
Thanks for the explanation.
Yes, “Nuremberg 2.0”, etc is kook stuff. Am surprised and disappointed that some well known FReepers have bought into that.
Fury wrote: “Yes, “Nuremberg 2.0”, etc is kook stuff. Am surprised and disappointed that some well known FReepers have bought into that.”
Why does that surprise you when we’ve had claims that the vaccines have killed more people than the virus or when we have posters claiming that doctors that have lost their licenses are credible sources of information? Then, there is my favorite, Stella Immanuel, a spokesman for America’s Front Line Doctors, claims that demons are impregnating women while they sleep.
BTW, American’s Front Line Doctor’s is a bunch of snake oil salesmen.
https://time.com/6092368/americas-frontline-doctors-covid-19-misinformation/
Now, just watch the cohort of anti-vaxxers who will attack me for posting fact checks from sources they do not like. FWIW, any fact check that does not support the anti-vaxxer narrative is suspect to them.
They used to test you when you donated blood but I think they stopped telling you. They don’t want a cure or treatment. They want you to OBEY
LOL. Whatever. About what I expected.
I watched the video. Not bad, just disappointed that the author is too lazy to put “pen to paper” to make his point.
So, who is the Mao in 2021?
Tony Heller’s on my long-term regular-watch list.
Whatever. Good luck.
Nothing can sway you as Bonhoeffer‘s Theory of Stupidity points out. It's not intellect it's the deficiency of morals
which pretty much guarantees I’m not going to get into a further discussion with you in this thread.
Good luck!
I believe this is the one Gates is behind. No end to the evil out of that guy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.