There's studies on this topic -- google google up a couple and see if you find them convincing.
But that's irrelevant to the point I made, which is that the article lies about what the CDC is saying.
The article claims The CDC just released an analysis that after you get vaccinated, your all-cause mortality drops by 72% if you are age 18-44.
Actually not only did the CDC not did make that absurd claim, they didn't even imply it. They specifically said the lower mortality in the vaccinated group is likely due to the "healthy vaccinee effect".
If that's wrong, someone should write an article saying: The CDC is wrong when they claim that people who decide to get vaccinated are healthier than people who don't
The author of that article could google up studies critical of the "healthy vaccinee effect" and discuss them.
In the meantime, any article that says The CDC just released an analysis that after you get vaccinated, your all-cause mortality drops by 72% if you are age 18-44 is just simply false.
No, they are just commenting on what the data published by the CDC means. Look at the table.
The titles of commentary about published reports don't have to be some PR agency style summary of the report. You seem to think that is a requirement for titles, but it isn't.