[bagster]

Ahh, I see what your problem is.

(from the article)

The CDC just released an analysis that after you get vaccinated, your all-cause mortality drops by 72% if you are age 18-44. Since 33% of deaths in that age group are from accidents, that means that it drives death from ALL diseases to ZERO and it ALSO reduces chance of dying in an accident.

The author is saying that, if the CDC is correct and 'all-cause' mortality drops by 72% for the vaccinated, ages 18-44, then it would have to follow that the figure drives deaths from ALL DISEASES to ZERO and ALSO would have to reduce the chances of dying in an accident. Which, as we all know, is completely ridiculous, thereby exposing the CDC study numbers as bogosity of the highest order.

Nobody is saying that, other than the CDC's bogus numbers. The author is merely pointing out how impossible that is.

You are looking for nits where there are none, simply to call tis article click bait and support your boy Fauci.

Get over yourself, and go look for another thread to scream CLICKBAIT!!! on. You're played out on this one.

Or you could tell the one about moving to Japan again. I like that story.

[edwinland]

The author is saying that, if the CDC is correct and 'all-cause' mortality drops by 72% for the vaccinated, ages 18-44, then it would have to follow that the figure drives deaths from ALL DISEASES to ZERO and ALSO would have to reduce the chances of dying in an accident.

Exactly. That is what the author is saying. It's also not what the CDC is saying. The CDC says that the differences between the two groups is likely due to the "healthy vaccinee effect" by which people who are healthier to begin with are more likely to get vaccinated.

Therefore you now can see that the author set up a false and absurd straw man. And the headline is a lie.

As a policy I ignore all personal comments directed at me until they rise to an abusive level that requires the involvement of a moderator.