Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: no-s
The purpose of Hollywood media fingering her is to divert attention from the circumstances surrounding the shooting itself, starting with why did Baldwin, an experienced actor and director, point the pistol at the cinematographer and pull the trigger? Did he willfully dismiss the risk? Did he even check the contents and the barrel of the pistol? Were there safety protocols that included his responsibility for handling the pistol safely? Did Baldwin deliberately exclude expert review of his actions?

You are leaving out the Union/non Union dispute which was going on set. This young woman was non Union and the other set members were Union.

I predict that the investigation will reveal a Union member deliberately put real bullets into one or more guns in an effort to make the "scab" look incompetent.

I do not believe anyone could be so incompetent as to put real bullets into a gun that she knows will be fired at other people.

That didn't happen until they have astonishingly good evidence that it did.

97 posted on 10/23/2021 2:04:03 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
You are leaving out the Union/non Union dispute which was going on set. This young woman was non Union and the other set members were Union.

Not outside the realm of the possible, but first we need to establish the responsibility of Baldwin, who was proximate. If the chain of custody was broken and another party snuck a live round it, how and why are pertinent but not exonerating of Baldwin..

100 posted on 10/23/2021 4:02:45 PM PDT by no-s (Jabonera, urna, jurado, cartucho ... ya sabes cómo va ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson