[ransomnote]

phoneman08 wrote:

Well it's not too much work for me to find the article below and others and, you know, read them. Let the rest of us handle the 'hard part', too much for you.

Some people are just not into comic books

Next thing we know, the "researchers" will find Kryptonite in the evil "jabs".

I see it was too hard for you to click on the link and read the first few sentences so you just imply it's worthless trash and make up your own trash instead because that's easier, and that's your 'contribution'. NOTHING.

So I did the hard part for you:

Toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles: a general review of the origins and mechanisms [SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH Open Access - Copyright Free]
biomedcentral.com ^ | October 31, 2016 | Lingling Ou,  Bin Song,  Huimin Liang,  Jia Liu,  Xiaoli Feng,  Bin Deng,  Ting Sun &  Longquan Shao

[phoneman08]

I see it was too hard for you to click on the link and read the first few sentences so you just imply it's worthless trash and make up your own trash instead because that's easier, and that's your 'contribution'. NOTHING.

Plutonium is deadly too. Just because a substance is harmful doesn't mean it is an ingredient in any vaccine. I know you think it is, but what's new? Graphene Oxide is not found on the ingredient list in any amount much less enough to cause human toxicity.

[cgbg]

If graphene nanoparticles were in vaccines that would be bad, very bad.

The question is—what evidence do we have that graphene nanoparticles are in the Covid vaccines _today_?

(There are lots of articles about how the mad scientists want to put them in vaccines in the future...and that is scary enough...)

[Nifster]

Oh goody. Chinese research. No doubt given to them by a bat