Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: sevlex

Two people shot, not one, neither was an actor. He aimed at them. Given this evil man’s temper and drunkenness, it really makes the “accident” suspect.


60 posted on 10/21/2021 8:56:33 PM PDT by AmericanMermaid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: AmericanMermaid

It’s not suspect at all if Baldwin was pointing the gun at the camera because that is the scene they wanted to film.


74 posted on 10/21/2021 9:06:19 PM PDT by Rebelbase (Were State Dept. Havana Syndrome victims the guinea pigs of 5G/graphene oxide "vaccine" tests?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: AmericanMermaid

But fire twice?


80 posted on 10/21/2021 9:14:43 PM PDT by AmericanMermaid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: AmericanMermaid

In a movie they do multiple shots from different angles. Often times it is an actor looking directly at the camera, with no one else in the shot.

It is absolutely believable he was “shooting” directly at the camera. The camera is run by the cinematographer. The director would be behind them, watching from the camera perspective.

That’s how it makes sense. Obviously, a live round in the chamber makes no sense.


162 posted on 10/22/2021 6:21:58 AM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson