[arthurus]

Nope. Don’t know the guy. Being skeptical doesn’t close me to other evidence. If porn on his equipment is the only thing they have against him then I would believe that there is no credible evidence of anything. Porn-on-the-laptop is too often a charge for political reasons. It is so easily placed that it should not be admitted as evidence in a court of law.

[know.your.why]

Nope. Don’t know the guy.

Then we're clear. You have absolutely no clue what/who you're talking about. Your hypothetical comments are interesting but totally irrelevant. I suggest you do your homework. Or dont...and continue to be irrelevant.