Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: gas_dr; ransomnote
Bro. The ONE time you actually took your time on a detailed post and appeared to have proof-read it, got the doctor worshippers to praise you for being 'brilliant', and Ransnomnote goes ahead and nukes it.

You just can't win, Gassie.


154 posted on 10/18/2021 11:00:45 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]


To: bagster

On the can ready. She cites the same dirty dozen and does nktjknf tk rehabilitate these flawed sources. She does not make argument. She repeats the same thing and essentially says I am right and you are wrong. She dismisses what I say as out of hand and then calls me a liar.

This is not argument. This is repeating the same thing over and over.

And you are not the referee. My arguments are not nuked. They are hardly addressed

I respect RN for a lot of her previous work. But this work on the vaccines is just not accurate. She and those who by her arguments use inflated statistics based on dubious sources and allegations that are not proven and certainly not borne out in observation. But such is the nature of attempting to argue complex theory when one has no foundation.

And even inn rare areas of agreement like mandates she turns it into an attack that I am a shill so I make some reasonable arguments in order to be a shill. She cannot speak for my intent or background. She has taken the position that she must b be 100% right and therefore anyone else must be 100% wrong. It’s a very tenuous place to be in a debate.


171 posted on 10/19/2021 3:59:17 AM PDT by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson