Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
To: nickcarraway
The real roots of the Rolling Stones. Has that "rolling" quality, way back in the early fifties. This was originally the B side of a record that didn't make it. There might have been others, can't remember them now.
To: nickcarraway
47 posted on
10/12/2021 5:47:46 PM PDT by
blackdog
(Let's go Brandon!)
To: nickcarraway
Doll in lower right corner has a shirt which reads "Welcome the Rolling Stones"
48 posted on
10/12/2021 5:48:36 PM PDT by
Flick Lives
(The future is a quiet world)
To: nickcarraway
49 posted on
10/12/2021 5:51:05 PM PDT by
aspasia
To: nickcarraway
What a joke coming from a member of the biggest fraud boy band of all time. The beatles couldn’t hold Keith Richard’s heroin syringe. The Stones were so far superior to the beatles they should probably not be spoken of in the same sentence.
52 posted on
10/12/2021 5:55:29 PM PDT by
fatman6502002
((The Team The Team The Team - Bo Schembechler circa 1969))
To: nickcarraway
55 posted on
10/12/2021 6:10:42 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
("Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy." ― Mao Zedong)
To: nickcarraway
The Who blows both of them away.
56 posted on
10/12/2021 6:12:35 PM PDT by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: nickcarraway
Reminds me of an old National Lampoon album - a parody rant by Lennon about the Stones. It’s been a while - all I remember is “....and Mick Jagger.....wigglin’ his a**.....you know it’s just a lot of bull****....”
58 posted on
10/12/2021 6:27:13 PM PDT by
Some Fat Guy in L.A.
(Still bitterly clinging to rational thought despite its unfashionability)
To: nickcarraway
Just watched a documentary about Gordon Lightfoot. Gord says he would work months on putting multiple ballads together for an album together with original words and all the music and then it gets released and almost immediately the Beatles bring out an album that sells in the millions while Gord’s sold in the thousands. He said it was very demoralizing but he didn’t stop. Thankfully.
To: nickcarraway
McCartney is somewhat overrated, i liked George Harrison best, at least he was a Traveling Willbury, Paul wasn’t.
61 posted on
10/12/2021 6:31:41 PM PDT by
Captain Peter Blood
(https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3804407/posts?q=1&;pag, and that)
To: nickcarraway
I asked a punk kid if he had a ticket would he go see the Stones.
Hell yes he said
63 posted on
10/12/2021 6:35:00 PM PDT by
South Dakota
(Patriotism is the new terrorism )
To: nickcarraway
66 posted on
10/12/2021 7:02:38 PM PDT by
yldstrk
(Bingo! We have a winner!)
To: nickcarraway
68 posted on
10/12/2021 7:10:23 PM PDT by
SuperLuminal
(Where is another Sam Adams now that we desperately need him?)
To: nickcarraway
Ca-ca just got real......
69 posted on
10/12/2021 7:11:43 PM PDT by
hoagy62
(DTCM&OTTH)
To: nickcarraway
If you read what he actually said it’s no big deal - but look at the headline: “McCartney ‘slams’ The Rolling Stones”.
I’m getting really sick of all the click bait garbage intended to rile people up to get clicks. It’s not helpful.
82 posted on
10/13/2021 12:17:54 AM PDT by
AC86UT89
To: nickcarraway
Who cares what any of these old, obsolete fossils think? About anything? Yawn.
83 posted on
10/13/2021 4:50:07 AM PDT by
LouAvul
(Farewell America. We barely knew you. )
To: nickcarraway
There’s a lot of differences and I love the Stones, but I’m with you. The Beatles were better.”
= = =
Stones ARE still here.
‘... Beatles WERE better.” says Paul.
How do the Beatles compare to your post-Beatle work, Paul?
Which is better?
91 posted on
10/13/2021 8:01:05 AM PDT by
Scrambler Bob
(My /s is more true than your /science (or you might mean /seance))
To: nickcarraway
93 posted on
10/16/2021 7:57:19 AM PDT by
Jeff Chandler
(THE ISSUE IS NEVER THE ISSUE. THE REVOLUTION IS THE ISSUE.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson