It is already edited to only 2 minutes long, and from their own mouths without a doubt are the exact words that support the headline to a fact.
So no you did not watch it, or as you say “scrubbed through the video”. 2 minutes is a “scrubbed” brief coverage “of the important parts” in it’s own right.
You obviously denounced it with bias without even being optimistic enough to watch only 2 minutes.
“It is already edited to only 2 minutes long, and from their own mouths without a doubt are the exact words that support the headline to a fact.”
The video embedded on the page linked from the article shows up as 0.00 minutes for me and does not play at all.
“So no you did not watch it, or as you say ‘scrubbed through the video’. 2 minutes is a ‘scrubbed’ brief coverage ‘of the important parts’ in it’s own right.”
I looked at the source video from the original post on this thread at this url:
https://www.c-span.org/video/?465845-1/universal-flu-vaccine
“Scrub” is a audio-video term. Here is a good explanation:
Moving the cursor or playhead across the video timeline manually is called video scrubbing. On a video editor, video scrubbing can be done by moving the cursor forwards or backward through the timeline or moving the scrubber at the bottom of the timeline. [From https://clipchamp.com/en/blog/video-scrubbing/ ]
I think you meant that the shorted video was edited down rather than scrubbed. Perhaps it is a problem on my end because I am having security issues with some sites, and that may have caused me to be unable to see the shorter video.
“You obviously denounced it with bias without even being optimistic enough to watch only 2 minutes.”
I wish I could see the edited version. It’s not visible to me. Your suggestion to watch a two-minute edited version is a reasonable one. If I can see it I will watch it.