By anti-Semitic, I presume what is really meant there is anti-Zionist or anti-Israel. Not saying that is a good thing but let’s face facts, 90% of Jews vote Democrat and whether they formulated the conscious thought or not, that means basically anti-Zionist (and therefore anti-Israel). I doubt that every Jew who votes Democrat is actually anti-Zionist but some are. And almost all are pro-lockdown because Jews are pro-science and science says we must have a lockdown.
I heard a Jewish commentator on a mainstream TV discussion ask this question — what is the so-called religious objection to vaccination? He genuinely didn’t know.
And that’s because it’s hidden away in the obscure New Testament. Don’t take the mark of the beast. This is the religious objection, sunshine. We were warned about this from a long time ago. And some of us take it seriously. But in the OT with which he might be more familiar is the warning not to take the side of the enemies of the Jews when they return to Jerusalem. And many seem untroubled by political parties in our countries who do just that.
Yet we who are observant of that command also are routinely called “Nazis” by those who are trying to keep the Jewish vote from straying out of the corral. Many times, it is not a Jew saying we are Nazis, but some atheist Democrat (or Liberal socialist whatever) looking to score points with Jews because Jews get to call the final shots in a lot of political questions, or so they think, and it’s fairly easy to smear conservatives with the fascist label with the help of useful idiots promoting communist revolution in our mainstream media. If only they had opened a book and read what happened to useful idiots after the Soviets gained power, or the Chinese for the same price. It doesn’t end well for useful idiots because, well, no longer useful. Thanks for coming and have a great time in the gulag.
I heard a Jewish commentator on a mainstream TV discussion ask this question — what is the so-called religious objection to vaccination? He genuinely didn’t know.
And that’s because it’s hidden away in the obscure New Testament. Don’t take the mark of the beast. This is the religious objection, sunshine. We were warned about this from a long time ago. And some of us take it seriously.
>The Jewish commentator didn’t know the religious objection because they reject Jesus as their Messiah, and Christian prophecy, including the prophecy about the mark of the beast.
If the warning is “hidden away” to the Jewish commentator, as you say, its high time Judaism and the world in general becomes aware of it:
Rev 14:9 And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand,
Rev 14:10 The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb:
Rev 14:11 And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name.
If this vaccination mandate is the means whereby this “obscure” passage is brought to light, I’d say that’s a good thing! The world needs to know about this.
But in the OT with which he might be more familiar is the warning not to take the side of the enemies of the Jews when they return to Jerusalem.
Israel, the so called Lost Tribes are elsewhere. Only God knows who and where they are for sure.
I wonder why the Jews didn’t call the nation Judah?