posted on 10/07/2021 11:10:16 PM PDT
To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; ...
posted on 10/07/2021 11:10:27 PM PDT
(<img src=' 'width=50%>)
perjury? ... or... treason?
posted on 10/07/2021 11:12:36 PM PDT
Can we please lock John Solomon and Sean Vanity in a room somewhere until Durham has completed his work?
posted on 10/08/2021 12:07:47 AM PDT
Very well received piece
Encouraging to read this analysis until option 3 “knee capping” the DOJ prosecution if it goes that far
posted on 10/08/2021 12:20:14 AM PDT
posted on 10/08/2021 12:53:07 AM PDT
Yea, it only makes sense that the information was forged, if they know who specifically did it, it is just another brick in the wall.
If the names Rodney Joffe, Neustar Inc, Steven Terrell, Mark Wauck, Lisa Hook, Packet Forensics, April Lorenzen, Zetalytics LLS, Jean Camp, Paul Vixje, David Dagon, Manos Atonikakis, are unfamiliar. They will soon be better known. One clue, Rodney Joffe and Manos Atonikakis are very spooky.
posted on 10/08/2021 5:15:01 AM PDT
To: bitt; Liz; Travis McGee
That last sentence is key. Durham hinted broadly in the Sussmann indictment that he suspects that some of the data in the ‘dossier’ that Sussmann presented to the FBI’s Baker was, in fact, “faked or forged.” The indictment included highly suggestive quotes form conspiratorial communications that would lead any reasonable person to to the belief that the conspirators knew that the documentation presented to the FBI did not support the Trump - Russia narrative. If Durham can show that any part of the data was faked—and one suspects that he wouldn’t have raised that issue in the indictment without a pretty good idea that he could do so—then it’s curtains for anyone who had a hand in it.
John Durham's getting closer...
posted on 10/08/2021 6:29:47 AM PDT
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOC_dcuJO48 Song: Willie (prick)Milley, Gen Austin & Winken Blinken)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson