I think one of the most important lines in this article is the second to last line. He was sly in using the term he used to define a certain segment of our society.
Re #9:
The author’s use of a euphemism is simply proof of the dire circumstances we are in. We cannot even talk to each other as adults without fear of getting in trouble.
PART of the strategy of the Inner Party is to attack white people as white people, to make white people suffer, to humiliate white people and to demoralize white people. Why? Because it is mostly white people who care about freedom and civilization, about America.
That care is not to be found significantly in non-white, Jewish or Islamic populations, although it is highly welcome and almost a relief when it is found there. The deserved adoration of someone like Canadace Owens, but more so a genuinely brilliant man and hero like Clarence Thomas, is a reflection of their unusual status.
Unfortunately, an Owens or a Thomas just provide an opportunity for white people (conservatives) to prove they are not “racist.” This activity is one of the champion time-wasters on our side. We are defending ourselves from hobgoblins, but we are not defending ourselves.