Oh how interesting. But sorry, history.defense.gov compiles oral interviews and is not an official accident investigative source.
Eye witness testimony for flash accidents is notoriously unreliable, every good detective and investigator knows this:
Expert explains why eyewitness testimonies can be unreliable in solving crimes
https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/video/expert-explains-eyewitness-testimonies-unreliable-solving-crimes-51054920
Am I saying these oral interviews are a bunch of lies? No, I am saying I wasn’t there, I don’t know anything about what was witnessed because I wasn’t there.
Someone might say “But AC remains were recovered!”
I would respond “There are people that say differently.”
“You mean AC remains weren’t recovered?”
“I don’t know, I wasn’t there.”
“But you believe no AC parts were found!”
“No, I don’t believe that, I don’t disbelieve it, I wasn’t there, I am not a witness.”
“But there were witnesses to the plane hitting the Pentagon!”
“Well, I don’t doubt that but there were also reported to be witnesses who have a different view like this guy Bob Pugh in the following video”:
Pentagon Eyewitness Bob Pugh Tells His Story
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xtEJ4zrIPM
Is Bob Pugh in this video a moron or conspiracy theorist? He ‘seems’ reasonable to me but I can’t say one way or the other.
“A report was made that someone from the FBI recovered blackbox/flight recorders from Flight 77. You don’t believe that?”
“I can’t say they were recovered. I can say that someone said that someone said they were recovered.”
If someone criticized me for doubting an FBI connected person found the recorders, I would respond “Ever hear of James Comey? Andrew McCabe? Peter Strzok?”
Does that mean Lin Wood lied? No, it doesn’t. It means he has some explaining to do.
Could Lin be mistaken? He could be, do I know that he is? No.
If someone said a missile hit the Pentagon on 911, I would ask, “What happened to Barbara Olsen?” I would ask Lin this.
If someone said airliners crashing into the Twin Towers caused them to fall, I would ask, “What about WTC-8?”
If someone said you’re a kook because there is no WTC-8, I would say, “oh sorry, it was a typo, I meant WTC-7.”
“No, no you’re trying to lie you’re way out of it, you were caught saying a building that doesn’t exist fell on 911 la-la-la-la!”
I would say, “have fun.”
But what is clear is you took a history compilation off the internet and used it to push a view of something you didn’t see. Why didn’t you find the authoritative source, the NTSB investigation report?
It’s said the NTSB was ordered to be silent by the FBI. If that’s true, why? If the FBI has jurisdiction over the evidence found by the NTSB investigators, why haven’t they released it all by now? Some of it was released years after the fact. Does it’s partial release have something to do with what President Trump said? That we would learn who is really behind 911?
The point is you are not a witness in this but act like you are and you are judgmental about people that don’t follow your non-witness witness. Have fun being you.
Hmmm.
The report “Pentagon 09/11” is much, much more than oral history. The report provides footnotes to primary sources and includes photos of AC parts in the Pentagon.
But even that is not good enough because now, wait for it - a historical record complied by the Pentagon historical office is not...the NTSB report. Wow.
And all this after you claimed in post after post 291 “ The OFFICIAL reports found no AC remains around WTC or the Pentagon.” Hmm. How do YOU know what the “OFFICIAL reports contain? And WHAT official reports are you referring to? You never seem to answer that question. My guess is because you were caught out making a claim you can’t back up.
What is probably the most disquieting is the “You weren’t there so you don’t know” theme. It’s intellectually lazy and the same sort of line (“We weren’t there so we don’t know what happened”) that was trotted out by a couple of FReepers when Mike Lindell’s Cyber Symposium didn’t deliver on what was claimed by Lindell.
As you allude to, the NTSB Safety Board does not plan to issue a report., and that some documents were released in 2017. So for now, the report/book “Pentagon 09/11” issued by the OSD Historical Office is the most authoritative official document that is publicly available.
Good luck!