Did you watch what Lin Wood said in his YouTube clip?
He was speaking about all the sites. He said a missile hit the Pentagon. He also mentioned WTC-7. He said there were no aircraft parts found at any site, which is is contradicted by photographic evidence at the NPS Flight 93 Memorial site (in the case of the PA site).
I asked you specially about WTC-7 the WTC-7 reports as YOU made very specific claims about a report not being done very well. How do I know what report you are referring to?
I provided links to the sites regarding information I brought up. You initially didn’t - and then got attitude when you did. Grow up.
Here is another report on WTC-7 done at UAF. A link is provided so that people can read what the report says instead of getting it filtered through FReeper(s) who have attitude:
From the home page:
“The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.”
> “photographic evidence at the NPS Flight 93”
Your links were unsolicited and irrelevant.
Flight 93 did not hit a building, did it?
How many times do you need to be told that Wood referred to WTC and Pentagon, NOT Flight 93?
The OFFICIAL reports found no AC remains around WTC or the Pentagon.
The unofficial news stories were never proven.
Wood, as a lawyer, is going to use official reports, not news stories because those are considered hearsay in a court of law.
> “I asked you specially about WTC-7 the WTC-7 reports as YOU made very specific claims about a report not being done very well. How do I know what report you are referring to?”
You really are an AH aren’t you?
nist.gov
Search: Final Report Collapse Building 7
Only one such report.
Find it.