Specifically what Wood said was that the Pentagon was hit by a missile and that “there were no plane fragments found at anywhere on any of the sites, New York, Pennsylvania, the Pentagon”
Specifically for the sites I know about, there were plane fragments found at the Pentagon and Pennsylvania.
Even a site that raises doubts about what happened on 09/11 has photos of plane fragments found:
http://www.911research.wtc7.net/planes/evidence/photos/index.html#analysis
as does the NPS:
https://www.nps.gov/media/photo/gallery.htm?pg=3941191&id=C7A45234-155D-451F-67A019C294E6A905
Wood referred to the official reports and those reports said no AC remains were found.
All the usual fake news suspects chimed in with reports that AC remains were found but they were never proven.
Wood, as a lawyer can’t follow hearsay. He sticks to official documents.
That’s why he didn’t say DIRECTLY that no planes flew into the Towers.
PA is a different story but Flight 93 never hit a building.
The Pentagon had witnesses that it was a missile and affidavits followed. Affidavits are evidence admissible in a court of law. Doesn’t mean they PROVE anything but they can help corroborate.
Wood is careful to make claims to facts backed by evidence. He can assert other charges based on information and belief. All trial lawyers do that. It’s nothing new. What’s different about Wood is he’s attacking the Deep State and their media morons are dispatched to dirty him up as a result.