You're not invited.
Contact Stephen Richer, you and he seem a match. I'm sure you both can play together.
(602) 506-3535
Posted on 10/03/2021 8:34:54 AM PDT by joesbucks
Pro-Trump attorney Lin Wood continues to promote conspiracy theories and misinformation at conservative events around the country, claiming at a Friday rally that no planes hit the Twin Towers or the Pentagon on September 11, 2001.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsweek.com ...
My apologies, the comment was originally directed to RBW in PA with you copied.
A good backgrounder on Jason Lemon would still be a valuable contribution.
Well ,we already know that it was Saudis and not Iraqis who were behind 9/11 and that is what Trump said we’ll very likely find out.
I am unaware of a single source where Trump is quoted as saying the WTC and Pentagon weren’t hit by planes.
“When contacted by the Washington Examiner for comment, Wood said that his statements were solely his “opinions” and refused to answer any questions regarding evidence for his claims.”
So Lin Wood is expressing opinions and not stating supportable facts which is his right to do and kudos for him in clarifying that his claims are just opinions.
Your commetn:
“No, I can’t quote that because I do not have that information and I wouldn’t quote it even if I had it because it must come through official channels. I might have a view or opinion, but not a quote.”
and you are expressing opinions on the matter which is fine.
That’s all you’ve got? Hardly surprising given that you are willing to believe utter nonsense. But I’ll play, just for fun. Now why, if there were two planes that targeted the WTC, and another crashing after the passengers fought back against the jihadis, would a missile be fired in to the Pentagon, since we know that four planes were hijacked? Where did the other plane go? You know, the one that didn’t hit the Pentagon. Are we going down the rabbit hole of a bad Hollywood script? You may think the report was bogus, and may even be right, but that in no way proves that a missile hit the Pentagon. What we have here, if you’re to be believed, are dueling eyewitness accounts, and given the fantastical nature of your claim I tend to believe those who actually saw a plane hit the Pentagon. But enjoy your secret knowledge, no matter how absurd.
If you watch the video, you will NOT see Wood saying “No Planes Hit the Towers” except for WTC-7 which was indeed not hit by a plane.
It was Jason Lemon of Newsweek that wrote the headline saying Wood claimed planes did not hit the towers.
Wood said no plane hit WTC-7 which is true.
Look at the video and confirm this.
Wood is not you enemy. He is on your side.
Newsweek on the other hand should be avoided like the Mask Karen at your local in-and-out store.
It’s pretty obvious you did not watch the video on Youtube.
Wood specifically mentions that the Pentagon was hit by a missile (a declarative statement) and says that “there were no plane fragments found at anywhere on any of the sites, New York, Pennsylvania, the Pentagon” (a declarative statement). Those statements are contradicted by evidence on the ground (at least in Pennsylvania and the Pentagon) so Wood is pushing false information.
I’m ordering “Pentagon 09/11” tomorrow that also talks about the aircraft debris and recovery efforts at the Pentagon. That book was put out by the Historical Office of the Office of the Secretary of Defense, so it can be considered “official”.
The 09/11 Commission Report did not detail any recovery details of bodies or aircraft parts, so when you write “The OFFICIAL reports found no AC remains around WTC or the Pentagon.”, that’s a very specific claim that you make. Where did you find it?
A site that provides some additional details is found at http://www.attivissimo.net/antibufala/meyssan/pentagon_debris_from_rense-com.pdf
I have the NIST report. I provided a link to the UAF report that calls info question the NIST report. Have you even read it? Good grief, you have an attitude.
You're not invited.
Contact Stephen Richer, you and he seem a match. I'm sure you both can play together.
(602) 506-3535
> “Wood specifically mentions that the Pentagon was hit by a missile”
So what? Why are you going on about it with me? I said the same, he mentioned the Pentagon was hit by a missile and there are witnesses and affidavits to that fact.
Why am I involved in your forum tirade here?
Re: 286 - Lots of theories in this thread.
Wood is definitely not being “lawyerly” when he declaratively states a missile hit the Pentagon and there were no AC parts found at any crash site.
That some FReepers hold up Wood such as they are is disappointing. See my post 242 for Wood’s 2020 tweet for claims about CJ Roberts. Claims for which Wood has still not provided any direct evidence. He’s a hack.
Hologram and a drone.
No tirade. You made some claims about Wood that are not borne out by the facts.
You made some claims about AC parts also not borne out by the facts (at least concerning the Pentagon).
Once I get the book on the detailed history of the 09/11 attacks, we’ll have some more specific evidence to refute your claims about AC parts not being found at the Pentagon.
Have a great day! Or whatever.
Answer the obvious question. If a missile hit the Pentagon rather than one of the hijacked planes, where is the plane?
I'll go in with you on a Mike Lindell pillow for him as well.
The A-ring.
If it hadn't been for those two, I don't think the allegations of 2020 election fraud would have gotten as far as they did.
And you and he came off the same tree.
I have just one question for this nutjob.
Where is Barbara Olsen?
L
Semper Supra. Cyber Eterna. Annuit Coeptis (He favors our undertakings). The motto is above Omnis Videntes Oculus.
See Bee Ess likes to think it sees all, but alas it cannot compare to Cyber Command- who does.
> “ou made some claims about AC parts also not borne out by the facts (at least concerning the Pentagon).”
Oh really?
What I said was that Lin Wood mentioned the Pentagon was hit by a missile and that I knew there were witnesses and affidavits to that claim.
Was I there? No.
All I can do is to repeat what others said and facts that I saw in connection with testimony.
Reports, some linked on FR, of witnesses on the scene as the Pentagon was blown up described a missile, others saying it was a plane but not making sense because the timing was so quick that details describing a plane would be unobtainable. Both planes and missiles can act like missiles but in the split second of approach and impact it would be difficult to say “I saw the plane approach with wing hitting ground” etc. A more plausible eye witness would be “in a about a second I saw a plume, maybe a plane or missile, and then an explosion of the Pentagon building” but such a reasonable report never came to my knowledge. Instead I saw a half dozen testimonies saying they saw the plane, they were nearly hit by the plane, saw wings on the plane, etc. Then I remembered that investigators are trained to take eye witness testimoney with a grain of salt because people see what they want to see, a mugger was 6 ft, no he was 5 ft, he wore a hoodie, no he wore a rain jacket, etc.
Is that me saying that? No.
Five years before TWA 800 was witnessed to have been hit by a missile and the credible witnesses, some were investigators and officials, were at odds over the narrative to explain it. There was CGE that was not credible. Whoever did the CGE claimed the AC turned up vertical and then a cable harness caught fire in the cargo hold eventually blowing up the fuel lines. That was discredited by ‘some’ FAA investigators and reports were they were silenced. The whole thing stunk.
Today, there is not a shred of doubt in my mind that the fake news cartel lie everyday without shame. It is so blatant that when people like Lin Wood make “outrageous” claims, I don’t join those calling his claims outrageous. I know he is a man who is doing the best he can to get the truth out. I don’t take what he says as Gospel but for sure I give him the benefit of the doubt whereas the Marxist Media in today’s so-called News won’t get squat from me. They are disgusting beyond limits.
Here’s a part of the 911 investigation documentary that does I think a good job calling into question whether the camera footage was doctored or not:
2017: 9/11 Pentagon Video FINALLY Reveals Truth About Attack (6 minutes)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=18AvDf2NWJU
He also famously defended Richard Jewell, rather admirably. His specialty is defamation suits, not mass terror incidents.
Missed your post on my later one. Great movie, Eastwood took a lot of crap about how they characterized the chickie reporter who was like every fake female reporter today.
That was that Lin Wood. His family is saying he became a Christian and went nuts, but then- they are after their inheritance money and he may have cut them out. He pulled 2 million out of Mercer Law School memorial because of their political hack job on him, by the Dean of the School no less.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.