Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jan_Sobieski

Full approval also requires publishing the ingredients. They say comirnaty is “legally similar” to Pfizer BioNTech. Doesn’t mean squat. Obvious they are hiding something.


19 posted on 10/03/2021 5:28:27 AM PDT by Chauncey Gardiner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Chauncey Gardiner

Not only the full ingredients, but full approval by FDA requires that and the continuing study trials updated in real time with the agent that is Brand Named. It is this requirement which then LEGALLY extends the all-important MAJOR difference in these two agents.

Comirnaty, when finally approved for release, will have LIABILITY for product placed on the MANUFACTURER— PFIZER.

The current “hey it’s the same thing” as administered NOW under Emergency Use Authorization- has NO liability whatsoever for Pfizer, and thus NO protection for the public from what is an experimental unapproved agent.

Big Difference. They are attempting to use the EUA as a live trial, and using the fedgov to FORCE injection to drive the trial “participants” (without their INFORMED CONSENT-— which is removed by a signed waiver prior to injection-which the current law and the Nuremburg Laws require in the US).


30 posted on 10/03/2021 7:35:54 AM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson