that boy is in a heap of trouble.
It sounds like there are some legal distinctions, between having child pornography, and being someone who is selling or distributing it. And that is part of the legal defense, is what it sounds like.
And this whole thing could fall apart, if there are legal rulings that they got the search warrant through improper procedures.
I’m reading the court docs now
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/96triyvd2ng77un/AAAX9lqR93dlgUuGZ33MCqRba?dl=0&preview=DEFENDANT%E2%80%99S+REPLY+IN+SUPPORT+OF+MOTION+TO+SUPPRESS+EVIDENCE+AND+REQUEST+FOR+A+FRANKS+HEARING.pdf
“And this whole thing could fall apart, if there are legal rulings that they got the search warrant through improper procedures.”
Thing about it is...does not matter if Josh was buying or selling it’s still illegal to download and own which it would appear he was so what is going to be the problem? Sensors were tipped off because he was viewing it.