[Mr. Jeeves]

It’s clear that there is an “Us” team of insiders who wants to keep all election results prearranged, to prevent accidental “Thems” like Donald Trump or Lauren Boebert from getting anywhere near power. But even on Team “Us” there are big differences of opinion on how things should be done.

Tucker is an influential “Us” who is much more sympathetic to “Thems” than almost any other media figure. He has value, because he can explain a “Them” viewpoint from his position of influence, even if he still thinks - in a Bush/Cheney-esque way - that Team “Us” keeping its finger on the scales at election time is an important safeguard against radicalism.

So I don’t see Tucker as an enemy or even as controlled opposition. If we had a hundred more like him, we wouldn’t be so far down the rabbit hole. He is not in danger of being killed by the Deep State because he is firmly on Team “Us”, but he articulates the failings of incompetent Team “Us” members in a way no other media figure can.

[stanne]

Agree. I do watch Tucker. But he falls way short of election steal info That’s fine. But I acknowledge it