I found two points prominent and well argued: vaccines have been proven to slide risk down a couple of decades and defeat age skewing. And, rather than vaccinating the lowest risk group, kids, and the highest risk group, elderly and then relying only on the vaccines to protect them, more should be done to address and interrupt the age-skewing of the disease - starting with the elderly and working down the age groups, instead of vaccinating the two population extremes (one of which doesn't need vaccinating) while leaving a mish mash in the middle. How to do that, is the discussion.
5. Average age of “Covid death” is greater than the average life expectancy. The average age of a “Covid death” in the UK is 82.5 years. In Italy it’s 86. Germany, 83. Switzerland, 86. Canada, 86. The US, 78, Australia, 82.
In almost all cases the median age of a “Covid death” is higher than the national life expectancy.
As such, for most of the world, the “pandemic” has had little-to-no impact on life expectancy. Contrast this with the Spanish flu, which saw a 28% drop in life expectancy in the US in just over a year. [source]
https://off-guardian.org/2021/09/22/30-facts-you-need-to-know-your-covid-cribsheet/
Okay, so really old people are most at risk. Fine, quarantine them, let them vaccinate if they wish, but leave the rest of us alone.
You make good points. But the problem with these statistics and others used to convince people to get the jabs is that they are using data that dates all the way back to the beginning of the “pandemic”. The “vaccines” do not give much, if any protection against the latest variants.