Posted on 09/26/2021 5:42:27 AM PDT by ransomnote
The only mistake I made was wasting my time addressing you. I’m a slow learner, but I do learn. Buzz off liar.
Another significant cache of documents related to coronavirus work at Wuhan Institute of Virology and EcoHealth has just been unearthed—again, by the same group of internet sleuths. Regardless of what you think of the content, this pattern is troubling. https://t.co/lo0MAxzZlu pic.twitter.com/nYMSTBU88g— zeynep tufekci (@zeynep) September 25, 2021
From your link....
eynep tufekci
@zeynep
·
Sep 25
Mysteriously missing: early sequences, databases, accounting of early cases, work we now learn *had been proposed* but we were told was a crazy conspiracy, an “investigation” led by conflicted parties, that was lied to but still proposed frozen food imports as plausible origin.
The "highly esteemed" NEJM is no better than the rest of the Communist-infiltrated journals.
Half of science may be wrong? That may be an underestimate. But at least Richard Horton, the editor in chief of The Lancet, is in the right ballpark.
"The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness."
-- The Editor in Chief of the Lancet in 2015
It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine. --Dr. Marcia Angell quoted in The New York Review in 2009.
(original link to that here: https://participatorymedicine.org/epatients/2012/03/former-nejm-editors-on-the-corruption-of-american-medicine-ny-times.html).
Troll.
You’ve got FReepers who have posted on this thread that pushed for masks and lockdowns on the COVID-19 threads in the early to mid-2020.They are against vaccinations.
“Pfizer’s vaccine “may be more than 90% effective.”
(Mahase, BMJ 2020;371:m4347, November 9)
Specific data are not given but it is easy enough to approximate
the numbers involved, based on the 94 cases in a trial that has
enrolled about 40,000 subjects:
8 cases in a vaccine group of 20,000 and 86 cases in a placebo
group of 20,000.
This yields a Covid-19 attack rate of 0.0004 in the vaccine group
and 0.0043 in the placebo group.
Relative risk (RR) for vaccination = 0.093, which translates into
a “vaccine effectiveness” of 90.7% [100(1-0.093)].
This sounds impressive, but the absolute risk reduction for an
individual is only about 0.4% (0.0043-0.0004=0.0039).
—> The Number Needed To Vaccinate (NNTV) = 256 (1/0.0039),
which means that to prevent just 1 Covid-19 case
256 individuals must get the vaccine; <—
—> the other 255 individuals derive no benefit, but are subject to
vaccine adverse effects, whatever they may be and whenever
we learn about them…… <—
h/t AMorePerfectUnion
>> preparing for winter...
>> David ‘Noob’ Chase collects nuts
lol — now that’s funny
Top. Kek.
Still doing the whole “character assassination” thing in lieu of facts.
I think it’s obvious that troll works for Hildebeast and her evil interests 👹
Flashback, #MAGA peeps.....
Trump Eyes Anti-Vaxxer Robert Kennedy, Jr., for Vaccine Safety Committee
https://www.self.com/story/donald-trump-robert-kennedy-jr-anti-vaccine
I’m sure Hildebeast BFFs Rience Pubius and Gov Krispy Kreme vetoed this choice, STAT.
When you've lost Team Bernie.....
#MisilleNotHelicopter
mac_truck wrote: |
“Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Klein reported receiving grants from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) during the conduct of the study, and grants from Pfizer, Merck, GSK, Sanofi Pasteur, and Protein Science (now SP) outside the submitted work. Ms Hanson reported receiving grants from CDC during the conduct of the study.” Are you surprised the Centers for Disease Control provides funding to a study on the long term adverse effects of vaccines...or that the report discloses those potential conflicts of interest right up front? |
*
I'm surprised we're still expected to pretend the CDC is legitimately pro-America after it was purchased by donations to the CDC 501c3 (Bill Gates, George Soros, Pfizer et. al), and has lied to the public, denied them medical treatment, mandates damaging Remdesivir and ventilators, ignores shocking numbers of deaths and maiming injuries from the 'vaccine' while freely enacting unconstitutional mandates to work to destroy the economy and with it, America and freedom. How could anyone trust the treasonous, murderous CDC or any who work for them?
That researcher stated his conflict of interest because it IS a conflict of interest for him to be reliant on federal funds and serving the purposes of the hand that feeds him. He can't afford to displease the CDC or any part of the Biden Regime's medical militia; he has to know they will destroy him if he criticizes them and fund him if his work supports them.
I'm just surprised to see some still trying to keep the pretense of a benevolent CDC alive. That ship sank long ago.
Pro tip....
I think you look better in your red-haired wig, smoking your cigarette get up, than as beaked, SpongePants 😂
Happy to help.
I think everyone knows who the trolls on this thread are Jane, your mask is slipping.
Wrong....troll....you are the one who plays dress up.
Now, buzz off, sicko.
Go light up.
“ David ‘Noob’ Chase collects nuts.”
——————————————————————————-
Yes you are 100% correct……..look at them all posting to me,
Check yourself dimwit...you don’t hold a franchise here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.