``````````````
statins do not contain niacin
https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2019/020702s073lbl.pdf
I strongly advocate adherence to anticoagulation therapy, under the care of a physician/coagulation monitoring.
Per the Katz dude pushing the niatonin protocol statins are 70% niacin. He said the same about regeneron?
Having a difficult time buying in to the niatonin protocol being pushed:
1. The so called DR is not very impressive. Watched one of his videos and suspected he was stoned? An example of some instructions he gave, not someone I would have confidence in "you know":
"So people with like low blood pressure especially, but this is mainly with the excess niacin flush, it will exasperate this and, and it will be you know, it's just it's way too thin a blood then and way too fast flowing. So that's like the you know, one of the main things to not kind of ever mix with with niacin, especially solo and I wouldn't recommend it with this protocol, because you're still getting some vasodilation and thinners are okay, but you know, this protocol does that the the, the what, what are the anti thrombotic properties of niacin, especially with the melatonin and getting it all the niacin yourselves and clearing this gunk that's you know, this is how clotting kind of progresses is the gunk in weapons and clogs blood and this can mean in many ways even the micro clotting . Oh, that can go in on now exhausted but basically, this protocol will be much more efficient, cleaner, natural and effective at any kind of anti thrombotic clotting resolution and prevention. So, but the thinners you know, see, I want to I want to do them at all, I would just drop them but you know, if the if the individual's stubborn about it, make sure to space them out like yeah, three, four hours apart and your best try to hit those sweet spots and there's no excess. And then it's like, you know, where you get to the sweet spots? I mean, you can drop them, you know, the individual wolf will will feel better early finally. And those those thinners you'll..."
2. He has suggested anyone on blood thinners to wean off them when on the protocol. "Space them out if you must take them, 3 hours after niatonin", but eventually stop taking them.
My wife's son is a neuroradiologist and performs interventional procedures for blood clots. He told me that a high percentage of patients with stokes that he sees have been on blood thinners (specifically eliquis that I am taking for afib) and had decided on their own to stop taking them. Very expensive is the main reason. They developed clots (what eliquis prevents) and will never be that same.
Could the niatonin protocol take the place of eliquis (blood thinners), perhaps, but not a risk worth taking IMO.
3. He is very anti ivermectin, claims it causes damage and is little or no value in treating covid. Seems he took it and had a reaction?
So much evidence that I have seen about ivermectin helping with covid. Katz may have had a reaction to ivermectin but to assume it is of no value in light of all the evidence to the contrary troubles me.
I'm not saying that the niatonin protocol has no value but also not buying completely into it. Anyone doing it should do so with caution and start out slow.
| TruthWillWin wrote: |
Having a difficult time buying in to the niatonin protocol being pushed: 1. The so called DR is not very impressive. Watched one of his videos and suspected he was stoned? An example of some instructions he gave, not someone I would have confidence in "you know": Excerpt: "So, but the thinners you know, see, I want to I want to do them at all, I would just drop them but you know, if the if the individual's stubborn about it, make sure to space them out like yeah, three, four hours apart and your best try to hit those sweet spots and there's no excess. And then it's like, you know, where you get to the sweet spots? I mean, you can drop them, you know, the individual wolf will will feel better early finally. And those those thinners you'll..." 2. He has suggested anyone on blood thinners to wean off them when on the protocol. "Space them out if you must take them, 3 hours after niatonin", but eventually stop taking them. My wife's son is a neuroradiologist and performs interventional procedures for blood clots. He told me that a high percentage of patients with stokes that he sees have been on blood thinners (specifically eliquis that I am taking for afib) and had decided on their own to stop taking them. Very expensive is the main reason. They developed clots (what eliquis prevents) and will never be that same. Could the niatonin protocol take the place of eliquis (blood thinners), perhaps, but not a risk worth taking IMO. 3. He is very anti ivermectin, claims it causes damage and is little or no value in treating covid. Seems he took it and had a reaction? So much evidence that I have seen about ivermectin helping with covid. Katz may have had a reaction to ivermectin but to assume it is of no value in light of all the evidence to the contrary troubles me. I'm not saying that the niatonin protocol has no value but also not buying completely into it. Anyone doing it should do so with caution and start out slow. |
*
Your insight regarding Katz is similar to mine. I found him untrustworty and read him as charlatan.
Advising people to stop blood thinners, without even knowing their medical history, in favor of his own protocol could kill people.
Advisng people to avoid Ivermectin could kill people.
On the link I checked out, Katz still featured his article advocating the Covid 'vaccines'. While it was pointed out that this may have occurred before he became aware, it was still listed on the same page as his protocol article and taken with his continued anti-ivermectin stance, I think his advice is likely damaging.
In my opinion, his advice is harmful to the current biowarefare effort, and he doesn't have much of a reputation to protect in comparison with doctors like McCullough, AFD, Zelenko etc.
bttt
I am so glad someone else thought the same as me. I was looking at his glassy, red-rimmed eyes and thinking he was on something, but the way he couldn't stand still or string two sentences together made me think it was meth.
He is very anti ivermectin, claims it causes damage and is little or no value in treating covid.
My problem with his statements about Ivermectin were not about reactions, but about the claims that doctors (he mentioned Dr. Kory by name) were pushing it to "make $25 million a week." That is just laughable. The doctors in the US who have proposed use of IVR have had their lives and careers DESTROYED over it. Not something someone would choose voluntarily. And I laugh at that $25M number. Not even.
``````````````
statins do not contain niacin
https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2019/020702s073lbl.pdf
I strongly advocate adherence to anticoagulation therapy, under the care of a physician/coagulation monitoring.