Potential declaration of a mistrial because one juror out of twelve acted inappropriately is not anywhere close to a not guilty verdict. If a mistrial is declared, he will be retried and convicted again.
“Potential declaration of a mistrial because one juror out of twelve acted inappropriately is not anywhere close to a not guilty verdict. If a mistrial is declared, he will be retried and convicted again.”
*****
“The new evidence makes a persuasive case that numerous witnesses saw Laci alive and walking the family dog—after Scott Peterson had left home for the day to stop at work and then fish in the San Francisco Bay (which, if true, totally undermines the state’s case against him). The evidence also suggests that Laci, upon returning from her walk, confronted shady characters burglarizing the house across the street from the Peterson’s home and that this incident started a chain of events that most likely led to her murder. And that’s just the tip of the iceberg.”
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/blind-injustice/201801/is-scott-peterson-innocent-part-one
Reasonable doubt. Free Scott Peterson.
https://www.thewrap.com/scott-peterson-penalty-phase-murder-trial-judge-rules/
FER gawd’s sake..we’re still wasting money on this idiot ?