Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled FISA Court Confirms The Government Lied In Every Spy Warrant Application Against Carter Pagetaxcontrol wrote:

I saw a lot of laws being reference in that court document. I even saw the words “unlawful” a couple of times. The two words that I was looking for I did not find:

“indictment”

“arrest”

I wonder when I will see those words.

 *

Since Jan 20, 2016, sealed indictments started stacking up in record numbers. 'Normal' is long gone - there's around a quarter of a million sealed indictments reported by PACER right now. That's about 6 to 10 times the number of sealed indictments that 'should' be there if we life were normal.

[H/T Mountainlion - thank you for monitoring the info and sharing the Sealed Indictments link]

President Trump's administration was obtaining indictments and sealing them, because the deep state had weakened America and controlled 'too much' at that time to rip the bandaid off. For example, military readiness had been gutted and the US had (intentionally building ships, subs, tanks out of inferior steel from China. China Biden wasn't the first, Obama and others before him worked to make sure the US was weakened before they made their moves.]

Hillary was supposed to win. Panic ensued when she did not. And the sealed indictments number took flight, and began to climb.

So while you haven't seen 'indictment' in the news, it doesn't mean they don't exist.

Below is the handiwork of a team of people who have been carefully accessing PACER and recording the sealed indicment count for some time now.

The link leads to extensive record keeping in Excel wherein sealed indictments are recorded by geographical region. There hasn't been a reason to unseal those indictments with fraudulent judges in place, more cleaning has to occur first for these indictments to have an impact.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kVQwX9l9HJ5F76x05ic_YnU_Z5yiVS96LbzAOP66EzA/edit#gid=1353310192

Here's just the summary at the bottom of the page. They were calculating how many sealed indictments we would be expected to have, if the normal number of indictments stayed the same, grew 5% annually, or grew 14% annually since 2006.

We're at 6 to 10 times above the normal number. There are signs in the news now, not just the election fraud news, that indicates these indictments are going to start surfacing in the news soon.

As President Trump works to hold those who stole the 2020 election accountable, the time for the unsealing of indictments draws nearer.

Many thanks to those who faithfully work through the PACER reports and record/organize it for us. They've been at it for almost 4 years now.


480 posted on 09/19/2021 10:30:30 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 424 | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote

I havn’t really followed sealed indictments since qmap went down.


483 posted on 09/19/2021 10:34:42 PM PDT by Ymani Cricket ( "Pressure Makes Diamonds" ~General Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 480 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote
The usual suspects


486 posted on 09/19/2021 10:40:28 PM PDT by Ymani Cricket ( "Pressure Makes Diamonds" ~General Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 480 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson