What’s your point?
What’s your point?
~~~~~~~~~
Their kind takes advantage of the fact that massive regions of India were forced to stop using Ivermectin, during which times epic, needless deaths soared off the charts. Some regions still forbid its use and many are dying at epic levels. This helps the pro-vaxxers claim Ivermectin doesn’t work, because they use India as a whole, including the regions which resumed use of Ivermectin, and saw deaths plummet. The tactic is for them to use the whole of India to falsely portray Ivermectin as failed, no matter how many studies come out proving it works.
I try to imagine who/what I would be if I had to spend my days advocating against using medications that save lives, but I can’t.
From the article: “ But the vast majority of their 22,883 recorded deaths came before they had distributed Ivermectin to nearly everyone in the state. Once Ivermectin usage became practically universal, their numbers started plummeting.”
This is what their kind try to distort - ignore distribution of Ivermectin and use times before or during prohibition of Ivermectin - use those numbers to trash the safe, cheap treatment for COvid, even in a comment on an article proving Covid works.
the point is, a counterpoint.
Ivermectin is good, vaccines cause variants VS ivermectin is ineffective and variants arose in areas of home remedy useage where no vaccines were available