Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: LibWhacker

100% of the “difference” is in the equipment (the nature of the equipment) doing the identification and measuring and not in quantum item being identified and measured.

It is a “wave” as known to a “detector” whose natural state is to identify a “wave”, and it is a particle to a “detector” whose natural state is to identify a “particle”.

In its own state, it (light) is neither while to us (because of our means of detection) it is both.

It truth the difference is not in the “property” of light but only in how it appears (to us) to behave, depending on which mode of detection is being used.


10 posted on 09/18/2021 10:20:08 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Wuli

Great post—science now recognizes (at least at the theoretical level) how critical the observer is (whether human or machine).

However, they have been hesitant to think through all of the implications for metaphysics and physics.

That will be the next “big jump” in human understanding.


14 posted on 09/18/2021 11:34:50 AM PDT by cgbg (A kleptocracy--if they can keep it. Think of it as the Cantillon Effect in action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson