Would you feel differently if they found evidence of a deceased body? Just wondering...
“Would you feel differently if they found evidence of a deceased body?”
Of course.
My concern is they’ll attribute routine signs of life as evidence of murder and build a case on it.
The only piece of physical evidence in the notorious Scott Peterson case was a single strand of hair found with a pair of pliers. Hair transfer is a real thing and this alone was held up as proof of murder when it could be easily explained as incidental transfer.
Consequently the death penalty in that case was correctly dismissed for lack of evidence.
I don’t want to see the police pooch this case the same way.