Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prosecutors Claim a Scar on Josh Duggar's Hands Matches Images Seized From His Computer
cafemom ^ | sept 14, 2021 | Nicole Pomarico

Posted on 09/15/2021 8:59:13 AM PDT by Morgana

The closer Josh Duggar's trial date gets, the more the little details of his investigation begin to add up. According to new court documents that have surfaced, a scar on Josh's hands match up to images seized from his computer in the evidence from his federal child pornography case. This is not looking good.

Josh's hands may help the prosecution identify the images on his computer as belonging to him.

In court documents obtained by Radar, prosecutors explained that they were able to see the same small scar on Josh's hand "in images recovered from the defendant’s electronic devices seized pursuant to a search warrant in this case."

They didn't elaborate where they saw his hand, though — whether it was a photo or a video.

Back in August, Josh's lawyers demanded that photos taken of Josh's hands and feet in jail be deleted.

They claimed that because law enforcement took the photos without Josh's lawyer present and because they didn't have a warrant, they shouldn't be allowed to use them. And at the same time, his legal team claimed that Josh wasn't allowed to consult with his lawyer during this time either.

"Duggar expressly asserted his constitutional right to consult with his attorney, attempted to exercise that right, and law enforcement stunningly reacted by physically preventing him from exercising that right," read their filing at the time.

(Excerpt) Read more at cafemom.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: childporn; duggar; joshduggar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: mn-bush-man

“Piece of garbage”

They haven’t shown me any evidence, not that I have any right or entitlement to it. If his hands have the scar and the scar shows up on the criminal pictures....

I served on a jury once, and they did not show us any evidence that connected our defendant to any crime. They spent three days showing that another person had committed another crime in another town and hinted that our defendant rode in a car with him once and may have known him or other people he knew. The other jurors were ready to burn the guy because he was half Hispanic and half black. We passed a revolver around the jury box that was not used in the crime(!) or any crime. The white jurors said in the deliberation room that “there was evidence against him, they just could not show it to us because the judge (suppressed) it”. I asked how they knew that and they would not say. I found out out much later that they had “looked it up” online at home during the trial. One white man said, “If he wasn’t guilty they would not have arrested him!” “How do you know that?” says I. One twenty year old white man said, “I know what he is, cause I went to school with people just like him.” Two blacks and I hung the jury.

Here is the Monty Python sketch in case you want to see it again:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrzMhU_4m-g


21 posted on 09/15/2021 10:58:23 AM PDT by BDParrish (God called, He said He'd take you back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dragonblustar

You are right about the adultery, but wrong in saying he “married” the women he lusted after.

Jesus made this distinction with the woman at the well. “I have no husband.” she said. “You are correct,” Jesus said, “You have had five husbands and he whom you now have is not your husband.”

Forgive me if I seem pedantic. I am a teacher and pastor by calling and profession.
Freegards!


22 posted on 09/15/2021 11:07:28 AM PDT by BDParrish (God called, He said He'd take you back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mn-bush-man

These people are in denial of what is happening.


23 posted on 09/15/2021 11:08:25 AM PDT by hsmomx3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mn-bush-man

“... I don’t think there are any allegations of child rape by this person...”

There is the confession BY HIM of molesting his little sisters when he was 13. He also molested a sleeping babysitter. I’m not splitting hairs but if someone enjoys watching the rape of an 18 month old on video... do you really think he is going to live out his sick fantasies online alone?


24 posted on 09/15/2021 11:15:34 AM PDT by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mn-bush-man

Question.
Even if pictures of his hands are excluded, how does this do any good? Won’t Duggar need to bring his hands with him into court?


25 posted on 09/15/2021 11:21:46 AM PDT by BDParrish (God called, He said He'd take you back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mn-bush-man

Why would they need identifying pictures of his hands if his hands aren’t IN the photos of children.

They haven’t made the allegation yet because they want to be able to back it up first, but I can’t think of another reason they wanted “identifying marks” pictures.


26 posted on 09/15/2021 11:22:53 AM PDT by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

If only they could match the illegal activity on the Hunter Biden laptop to Hunter.


27 posted on 09/15/2021 11:40:00 AM PDT by pas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BDParrish
You are right about the adultery, but wrong in saying he “married” the women he lusted after.

If you believe that sex is for marriage and marriage alone. Women who were raped had to marry their rapist. If the spirit of the law means you commit adultery with a lustful thought, then isn't it also rape because it was non-consenting. Scientifically speaking, a man's brain does not distinguish between real life and fantasy when he masturbates. He creates lasting bonds in his brain to the thoughts/images he's jerking off to. That's another reason why masturbation is so offensive. He may finish is act, then go on the the next women but his brain has already cemented his actions with that image for life.

28 posted on 09/15/2021 12:15:04 PM PDT by dragonblustar (2 Peter 2:14,1 Corinthians 6:18-20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dragonblustar

He creates lasting bonds in his brain to the thoughts/images he’s jerking off to. That’s another reason why masturbation is so offensive. He may finish is act, then go on the the next women but his brain has already cemented his actions with that image for life........WUHHHH?


29 posted on 09/15/2021 12:21:37 PM PDT by Safetgiver (Stupid man Bad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: dragonblustar

I do not think you will find any agreement with an attempt to equate lust or masturbation with rape. I suspect, and I don’t know you, I would need to question you further and I have no interest in doing that sir, but I suspect because I have seen something similar done by another, that you are attempting to make the sin more sinful by attaching it to terminology which may convey the appropriate abhorrence.

I recommend that you stay with the plain wording of the Bible. God did a good job writing it, and it works for His intended purpose.

If you could establish it scientifically you might be able to say that there are “lasting bonds in the brain”. You would need to do that first to be taken seriously. I have seen some data suggesting that pornography rewires the brain, but that only applies to its addictive nature, not that there is some connection to the object of lust.

You at least used interrogative phrasing when you said, “Isn’t it also rape because it is non consenting?” This you meant to hedge the statement because you realize how very far off the mark you have gone. Please do not cheapen the word rape as you attempted to cheapen the word marriage, in your effort to demonize Duggar.


30 posted on 09/15/2021 1:06:27 PM PDT by BDParrish (God called, He said He'd take you back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: dragonblustar

Here is an article which my help to clear your confusion as to the matter of a woman marrying her rapist:
https://www.gotquestions.org/Deuteronomy-22-28-29-marry-rapist.html


31 posted on 09/15/2021 1:15:42 PM PDT by BDParrish (God called, He said He'd take you back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Celerity; mn-bush-man; momtothree; Chode

That boy has gone from being “The Crown Prince of Quiverfull” to “The Fresh Prince of Perversion”


32 posted on 09/15/2021 2:01:59 PM PDT by Morgana ( Always a bit of truth in dark humor. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson