Of course not. It’s about control.
Vaccines are not about your health, anywhere they are mandated. If the vaccine cannot be sold on the solid good results it provides, and show a cost-benefit ratio that is definitely positive, then it should be tabled, or on a volunteer-only basis until either an improved form becomes available, or the efficacy does not meet expectations.
The history of polio vaccines is highly instructive. The Salk version, which relied on killed-virus injections, was first introduced, then the Sabin version, which was taken orally, and was much easier to take, but had problems with actually had some side effects not noted with the injection.
But the primary factor in both these methods is the use of killed virus as the trigger for the immune response, and not some derived anti-virus particle, that may or may not induce the immune response.
There should be some sort of ongoing research into producing a similar killed-virus vaccine for COVID-19 Wuhan virus, but until then, treatment with EFFECTIVE medications is the more rational approach to control and elimination of this disease.
Prevention, through dietary changes which include adding sufficient zinc ion to the diet, and some kind of Zn++ ionophore in appropriate doses, and the use of UV-C light and ozone to keep closed spaces sanitized, plus plenty of exposure to sunshine and fresh air while outside, is probably the best course to follow.
Treatment of the disease, once contracted, is dependent on timely administration of an effective treatment. No matter how badly it has been maligned in print and by “authorities”, ivermectin, given in the appropriate dosage and and early in the course of the disease, does work, demonstrated over and over again. The hydroxychloroquine-zinc-azithromycin protocol also works, especially when given in the early stages of the disease.