[cgbg]

I don’t see any reason an employer or a private business can’t decide whether or not to require the jab.

I have no problem with an employer telling _prospective_ employees they have to take a jab.

The problem is with existing employees. If you unilaterally change the working conditions (in a way that is very important--at least to some employees) you are basically stabbing them in the back, baiting and switching them.

That would apply to _any_ type of major change in working conditions--very very bad employee relations.

I suppose a corporation _can_ do that--but it is so stupid and evil that only the most Neanderthal clowns would even consider it.

[linedrive]

Regarding the argument against this ‘vaccine’ being forced upon us. If this can be successfully resisted what bearing would it have on current vaccination policy regarding attending public school? Is this something that could eliminate all requirements?
First - this is not a vaccine
Second - the definition of vaccine has been changed to better fit this jab
Third - if it were truly as bad as they say more people would be (willingly) getting in line for the jab; no need to push advertising campaigns similar to selling automobile insurance or ED fixes.

[PerConPat]

Certainly, every employer should carefully consider their actions as to the jabs; the bottom line, IMO, is their freedom to mandate or not to mandate—at their discretion.

[DHerion]

If employees are compelled to take the jab or lose their jobs, and have an adverse reaction, or die...the companies will be sued...and unlike the vax makers I don’t think they are protected.