Can we PLEASE stop with the data that doesn’t decide how many die this winter? WHAT IS THE VAXed Death Count in an environment of 80+% (NOT 50%) Delta vs pre Delta.
Every damn bit of data is CORRUPTED by looking at January to whenever, sometimes July, but even August . . . that’s WORTHLESS. That is measuring performance against a virus that no longer exists.
WHAT IS THE EFFECTIVENESS VS DELTA? Not a 50/50 mix. An 80/20 or 90/10 mix.
One can only presume this VERY OBVIOUS item of information is being withheld because it shows a collapse of efficacy. But because it’s something like 45%, they conclude that’s better than nothing so they will withhold the info and thus avoid undercutting the inclination of people to get vaxed.
>> Every damn bit of data is CORRUPTED
Yes & no. And example of “no” is the data in your post — we can derive new datasets from the seemingly corrupt data.
I regret not having the time and resources/personnel to do a deep dive into the multitude of datasets with comparative analysis of the trends from previous years.