To: blueplum
polymerase chain reaction == PCR
A test that even the CDC admits cannot tell the difference between the common every-day flu and COVID-19.
A test that if the cycles of said test, according to its inventor, is performed with 30+ cycles, throws a false-positive rate of 80%+. And that 30+ cycles rate, is what I believe most hospitals are using.
So, in conclusion, if your study is based on the failed PCR test, it is worthless.
7 posted on
09/08/2021 11:58:50 PM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: SoConPubbie
I think symptomatic infection is the better baseline. but that baseline and the total study #, can be used to guestimate the # asymptomatics pretty well without a PCR test, using the rate of asymptomatics in the genpop as a reference.
For instance, we know that only about 20% of the US pop acquired wild immunity. So we can guestimate that 15-20% roughly of those wildings, were reinfected.
9 posted on
09/09/2021 12:14:33 AM PDT by
blueplum
("...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017) )
To: SoConPubbie
25 posted on
09/09/2021 3:56:22 AM PDT by
mewzilla
(Those aren't masks. They're muzzles. )
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson