The next paragraph after the abstract includes this statement:
Antigen test and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for SARS-CoV-2 were negative.
The specific antigen test used was for nucleocapsid IgG/IgM, as stated in the abstract and this statement confirms it was negative, whether "elicited" or not.
The PCR test was also for for SARS-CoV-2, not the spike(S1) protein. It was also negative, and says nothing about the spike protein. That was a different test, documented in the abstract.
The antigen test will show antibodies as a result of recovery from either old or about 7 - 14 days earlier infection.
The PCR test looks for current infection that has not yet produced antibodies. It will show positive if active virus is present.
These two tests together strongly indicate he was neither currently infected with Covid-19, nor had he been infected with Covid-19 earlier. Other tests used in this autopsy strongly indicate widespread presence of the spike(S1) protein.
That spike(S1) protein is the one specifically produced by the mRNA covid-19 vaccine.
I really don't know how to make it any plainer than that.
You can pick and choose to wordsmith phrases if you like, but that does not alter the evidence presented in this autopsy.
From the article…
“On day 25, our patient tested SARS-CoV-2 positive by real-time PCR (RT-PCR), with a low cycle threshold (Ct) value indicating high virus load.”
I’m not picking and choosing. I’m reading for content.
bkmk