Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: !1776!
"I’m not picking and choosing. I’m reading for content."

Oh yeah?

Looks to me like you DID choose and highlight that particular content. I assume that choice was selected to promote the impression that his death was actually caused in some way by the Covid-19 virus, in spite of all the evidence in this autopsy that it was not.

I wonder why...

Yes, that's exactly what was in the autopsy, and it's exactly what I reported was in the autopsy.

And it was 25 days after the man was vaccinated, 10 days after he became critically ill, 7 days after his first negative test (no virus) 5 days after his second negative test (no virus) and exactly one day before the man died.

It's pretty unlikely that the virus he contracted 1 day before his death was the cause of his death. It just doesn't work that fast, especially if the current claimed benefit of the vaccine (which he had from 24 days earlier) is lessening of the danger from the actual virus

116 posted on 09/07/2021 8:49:22 PM PDT by Grandpa Drudge (Just an old man, desperate to preserve our great country for my great grandchildren.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]


To: Grandpa Drudge

Your original post stated:

“They found that every single organ of the now-deceased person’s body had become infested with spike proteins due to the jab.”

I noted from the article that he tested positive for COVID before he died. Didn’t say he died from COVID - don’t assume. Died with COVID seems likely based on the positive test.the day before he died. That isn’t the same as died from COVID.

The previous posts noted that certain data did not elucidate info related to identifying vaccine v wild antibodies - so there isn’t data there.

And finally, since you think I’m picking and choosing - why does the original post you provided state:

“They found that every single organ of the now-deceased person’s body had become infested with spike proteins due to the jab.”

While the actual article notes:

“except for the liver and olfactory bulb. These results might suggest that the first vaccination induces immunogenicity but not sterile immunity.”

Those exceptions noted in the article are organs, so the statement that every single organ in your original post is at best poor reading comprehension skills,

So to recap - I’m not picking and choosing like you, I’m reading for content.


117 posted on 09/08/2021 6:45:38 PM PDT by !1776!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson