If 95% of the players are vaccinated and half of the infections are among the vaccinated, with the other half of infections being among the unvaccinated, then that would indicate that the vaccine reduces the chances of infection by a factor of about TEN. Another way of saying the same thing is that the vaccine is 90% effective at preventing infection.
You are back to “everyone that dies has eaten a carrot. There fore carrots cause death.....................”
Liberals look for simple answers, I thought conservatives had a thinking cap.
Statistics, NEVER gives you an answer. At best, it gives you another question. But sheep want simple answers and will follow the simple answers.
Which of those factors make my statement untrue?