Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dadfly

but back to leaky vaccines. It’s probably more accurate to say leaky immune system, since those that recovered from covid are still vulnerable to Delta, but I kind of look at asymptomatic and mild reinfections the same way people decried ‘cases’ last year, feeling they were insignificant, and wanting only hospitalization numbers. So that’s what I look at. Hospitalizations/deaths count, all else is noise.


13 posted on 09/02/2021 1:49:28 AM PDT by blueplum ("...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: blueplum

“leaky immune system”? not sure what that means. a healthy person’s immune system is never leaky. do you mean the immuno-compromised? if so, that has nothing to do with leaky vaccines. leaky vaccines simply don’t do the job they’re designed for.

the purpose and goal of any vaccine is to prevent infection by benignly notifying/stimulating your natural immune system to recognize and destroy any incoming virus thus preventing them from infecting your vulnerable cells and using them to replicate.

its job is to confer an artificially generated immunity from a disease, for a period of time that should amount to years or even decades. even the crummy flu vaxx is only given every year. that’s just a fact. by history and experience we know that artificial immunity is never as good as the real thing. thus we get breakthrough when a vaccine is leaky. breakthrough means virus is replicating in your cells. and thus you’re shedding it. therefore you’re potentially infecting others. i’m not even talking about the vaccine injuries here although there is plenty of evidence for that. that is an open question. at the point where you’re spreading the disease in less than even 1 year, the vaccine has already failed. period.

another fact is that no effect cold vaccine has ever been developed and that’s not for a lack of attempted failures.

this rushed “vaccine” (with two shots) which were in practice given about a month apart has a durability of about 5 months. there are enough studies with hard numbers from hospitals to confirm that (not the lancet). that’s just crap performance for a vaccine. yes i know this is not really a vaccine.

in terms of death rate (natural, overall odds), we basically had a fair idea of that last summer. the estimated death rate (yes i know we don’t have good test numbers or good death numbers) would be with the original virus and a fair (imo) estimate of that is about .00018 (my calc on natural odds using the cdc’s own data and conclusions about covid19 being the sole cause of death at about 6%, and which is in line with what i calculated last summer on the back of my envelope). yes i realize that the 80+ elderly has about a 5% chance of dying with the infection, but that was reducible by Dr Zelenko’s group treatment to .5%. and again even that proven successful treatment was suppressed by the FDA.

there’s really no medical argument for the vaccines left, imo. except the political one. and that one is more and more proving to be deadly and enslaving as we get more and more data (vaers, eudravigilence, annecdotal, my own friends experiencing serious vaccine side effects and injuries, etc.).


19 posted on 09/02/2021 2:40:24 AM PDT by dadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson