Posted on 08/31/2021 8:31:23 AM PDT by Hojczyk
The same false information that top immunization advisers and officials at the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) promulgated months ago somehow worked its way into an article in the medical journal Science published by the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).
The information incorrectly claimed, once again, that a new study showed people with natural immunity to Covid-19 after infection benefit further if they still get vaccinated, anyway.
The writer of the article appeared to use the misinformation to try to undercut the findings of the large study in Israel that found natural immunity is far superior to vaccination in preventing Covid-19. The study amplifies the results of many other studies that concluded the same thing.
The mistake in the Science article is oddly similar to disinformation repeatedly put out by CDC, which continues to push people with natural immunity to get vaccinated.
Last December, Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Kentucky) flagged CDC's false information, However, the CDC scientists and officials continued to make the false claims to doctors and the public.
More media mistakes here
When Massie flagged the untrue information again, CDC eventually issued a correction. However, the correction was so obtuse, it continued to give the same wrong impression: that studies showed people who already had Covid-19 somehow further benefit from vaccination.
In the case of the false information being published in Science, it was flagged by a reader on Twitter.
The journal then deleted the false information and posted a clarification.
Clearly, there is an organized attempt to use fabricated scientific claims to convince people who have had Covid-19 to get vaccinated despite the fact that a growing body of studies show no benefit to them. The idea that these claims are generated by or repeated by top scientific authorities, such as CDC, is remarkable.
(Excerpt) Read more at sharylattkisson.com ...
They are up to something we’re not supposed to know about.
Maybe if they want to end “vaccine hesitancy”, a first step would be to stop blatantly lying about the vaccines...
Ivermectin shields the receptor against EVERY new, mutated, or bio-engineered spike protein.
But, it’s been used on humans safely for 40 years, is cheap, and readily available.
Therefore it interferes with Big Pharma’s cash cow...the “ vaccine “.
First of all
The vaccine industry is pure evil and fraudulent
They care nothing about health at all and only care about making money and control over people
Right now the vaccine industry is trying to implement global digital passport control schemes as a part of the great reset to try to destroy free civilization and create a prison state
If you doubt any of this just look at Australia or Canada and you will see where they’re trying to go
Fortunately in America we have 50 different states which service different laboratories for freedom or tyranny and in addition in every single state we have a very well armed citizenry so the communist or not going to get so far here
there should be a warning label on the front of the FDA:
“We are the FDA. We lie. Our labels lie.
But YOU MUST be good and take your untested “Vaccine”
for pFizer,
as agreed between us and them in 2019;
or you and your children will die.
Obey us. We are the FDA.”
Perhaps Camelface should be awarded a special pageant crown, that of “Miss Information” with an a beautiful sash accordingly titled.
The vaccine industry is pure evil and fraudulent
Pete and Repeat sitting on a bridge.
I was at the doctors for the first time this morning, my new primary care doctor. I tested positive for covid on August 10th 2021. The doctor told me that I should still get the vax because it will make me immune to more variants. And that my natural immunity is only for the delta variant. I said that even the CDC is recognizing that natural immunity is equivalent to the vax induced less sever symptoms. He had nothing to add to that and said I will not be getting the vax.
Just one more reason to doubt even the so-called trained professionals. These numbskulls are everywhere purporting the jab is good!
Consider if the CDC allowed people with natural immunity to Covid following infection to *not* get the vaccine. In that scenario one could easily track the rate of later Covid infection in those who got the vaccine and those who previously acquired natural immunity thru prior infection.
By forcing everyone to get the vaccine, you statistically ‘bury’ the naturally immune in with the pool of vaccinated people. So now if someone who was vaccinated gets Covid, are they getting it because the vaccine failed? Are those who are *not* getting Covid not getting it because they’re protected by their natural immunity? The CDC has made this analysis impossible.
Aside, earlier today in another thread a thought occurred to me about what they may be up to, which I expanded on here:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3990532/posts?page=106#106
Mr. FauChi built a banned gain-of-function bioweapon and every being on the planet was exposed to it.
This is diabolical.
Note that “natural immunity is better than vaccine immunity” is not at all the same thing as “vaccine with previous infection is better than just the vaccine or just a previous infection”.
10 dollars is better than 1 dollar, but 10 dollars plus 1 dollar is better still.
Of course, you do have to do a study to see if the vaccine improves antibody load over just being infected — and the studies show it does. But it isn’t surprising.
? ...have seen no study showing that, can you name one?
I have seen international results that show natural post ChiFlu antibodies to be 12X to 25+X greater than any jabbed person... ymmv
Reference to Israeli study that showed 13x better protection from previous infection than from the vaccine, BUT also found better protection from vaccinated infected people, than non-vaccinated infected people.
Frankly, I would expect that if you took both the Pfizer and the J&J vaccines, you'd have better protection, since each works differently and activates different antibody protection.
I believe there is a clinical trial going on for that now. My guess is if you got Pfizer in March, that taking a J&J vaccine in september would give you better protection than taking a J&J booster. I'd like someone to run that trial and tell us. It's amazing how little data we have.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.