> YOU.HAVE.GOT.TO.BE.JOKING! <
Nope. I have a degree in chemistry, with a background in analytical chemistry. That doesn’t make me an expert in everything. But I have considerable experience analyzing trace materials in lab samples.
Please permit me to give you another example (besides my mice poop one). Cyanide is a deadly chemical. But it is present in municipal water supplies! Is that a cause for concern? No, because the amount is so vanishingly small.
Same goes with graphene oxide present in the vaccines. I’m not saying to ignore it! I am saying that to determine the threat, we need to know the amount, and the of danger that amount.
The rational are not welcome on this thread. (But thanks for showing up).
Nope. I have a degree in chemistry, with a background in analytical chemistry. That doesn’t make me an expert in everything. But I have considerable experience analyzing trace materials in lab samples.
Analyzing trace materials in a lab doesn't seem to have contributed much to your understanding. Do you recall, from your lab experience, that 'reagent grade chemicals' are purer than generic substances because minute 'trace amounts' of debris or contaminants could destroy experimental results? That would have been in the first portion of the introductory course in Chemistry, possibly taken in high school.
Please permit me to give you another example (besides my mice poop one). Cyanide is a deadly chemical. But it is present in municipal water supplies! Is that a cause for concern? No, because the amount is so vanishingly small.
Doesn't mean cyanide is not harmful. Doesn't mean the public should be forced to accept injections tainted with cyanide. You're talking about a natural system contaminated via a complex set of ways. I'm talking about starting with an empty containment vessel and adding only reagent grade chemicals to it in a closed system. Your lab work on trace chemicals should have shown you that such trace amounts are 1) detectable and 2) removable.
Same goes with graphene oxide present in the vaccines. I’m not saying to ignore it! I am saying that to determine the threat, we need to know the amount, and the of danger that amount.
We can draw the line, and set the bar high - we can dare to demand poisons not be put into injections being forced upon the entire world's population. I've already posted a few threads on high amounts of graphene oxide found in Pfizer (95%) and also graphene oxide in Moderna. A pfizer employee said Pfizer put it in their PEG (PEGylated lipid) and didn't have to list graphene oxide separately because they claimed graphene oxide was a 'trade secret'.
I don't know if you noticed, but 61% of all post vaccination deaths reported in VAERS 30 year history are for Covid 'vaccine' recipients. Hmmmm.....maybe putting a toxin in a vaccine has SOMETHING to do with this?
Oh, but another 45 thousand post Covid 'vaccination deaths' are, according to a gov whistleblower, sitting in the nation's CMS database (medicare) instead of being reported to VAERS. Hmmm....WHAT could be causing the problem???
PEG is known to cause anaphylaxis. Pfizer's PEG contains a known toxin, graphene oxide. How can Pfizer put PEG in a vaccine to be given worldwide knowing it can cause anaphylaxis without listing it on the ingredients insert?