Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dsc

except the cdc did not say it can’t distinguish between covid and the flu. repeating a lie over and over does not make it true


55 posted on 08/27/2021 5:00:25 PM PDT by Mom MD ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: Mom MD

“except the cdc did not say it can’t distinguish between covid and the flu.”

https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/cdc-finally-pulling-pcr-tests-as-they-cant-differentiate-between-covid-and-the-flu/

CDC Finally Pulling PCR Tests as They Can’t Differentiate Between Covid and the Flu...

Alternative News via Twitter ^ | 07/24/21 | Alternative News
Posted on 7/24/2021, 12:11:56 PM by Enlightened1

CDC finally pulling PCR tests as they can’t differentiate between Covid and the Flu...

“CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses.”

https://twitter.com/NewsAlternative/status/1418964939776040961

“After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel”

Furthermore:

“In preparation for this change, CDC recommends clinical laboratories and testing sites that have been using the CDC 2019-nCoV RT-PCR assay select and begin their transition to another FDA-authorized COVID-19 test. CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses.”

You will have to draw your own conclusions...

For some of us the implications of this staggering when it comes to every single PCR test performed on people who were classified as COVID positive yet without the clear differentiation of whether it is / was a flu... So now we know how the flu disappeared (as if we did not already know)

Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) has been a cloak to use faulty testing and untested synthetic gene therapies.


61 posted on 08/27/2021 5:09:07 PM PDT by dsc (...let us run with perseverance the race marked out for us...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: Mom MD

CDC/FDA Confess - They Had No Virus When They Concocted the Test for the Virus

https://principia-scientific.com/cdc-fda-confess-they-had-no-virus-they-created-the-test-for/

CFP ^ | 7/29/2021 | Jon Rappoport

Posted on 7/29/2021, 8:42:29 PM by logi_cal869

CDC/FDA are confessing there has been a PROBLEM with the PCR test which has been used to detect the virus, starting in February of 2020—-right up to this minute.

In other words, the millions and millions of “COVID cases” based on the PCR test in use are all suspect.

To confirm this, the CDC document links to an FDA release titled, “SARS-CoV-2 Reference Panel Comparative Data.” Here is a killer quote:

“During the early months of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, clinical specimens [of the virus] were not readily available to developers of IVDs [in vitro diagnostics] to detect SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, the FDA authorized IVDs based on available data from contrived samples generated from a range of SARS-CoV-2 material sources (for example, gene specific RNA, synthetic RNA, or whole genome viral RNA) for analytical and clinical performance evaluation. While validation using these contrived specimens provided a measure of confidence in test performance at the beginning of the pandemic, it is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples derived from different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources.”

Translation: We, at the CDC, did not have a specimen of the SARS-CoV-2 virus when we concocted the PCR test for SARS-CoV-2. Yes, it’s unbelievable, right? And that’s the test we’ve been using all along. So we CONTRIVED samples of the virus. We fabricated. We lied. We made up [invented] synthetic gene sequences and we SAID these sequences HAD TO BE close to the sequence of SARS-CoV-2, without having the faintest idea of what we were doing, because, again, we didn’t have an actual specimen of the virus. We had no proof THERE WAS something called SARS-CoV-2.


65 posted on 08/27/2021 5:13:40 PM PDT by dsc (...let us run with perseverance the race marked out for us...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson