Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: freeandfreezing

“Maybe you took your course in molecular genetics before sequencing was developed. But wouldn’t the sequences done by the CDC pretty definitively identify COVID-19 vs. an influenza virus?”

I would think so, but we’re not talking about sequencing. We’re talking about the PCR test, which is not suitable for that. Here’s something I found:

The fact that a primer works for PCR does not ensure that it will work for sequencing. PCR reactions are exponential and can use newly created product as template. Sequencing is linear and creates many fragments of different sizes. They are not the same thing.

Everybody has been using the PCR, not full-bore, time-consuming, expensive sequencing. And that is what the CDC has admitted does not work.


109 posted on 08/28/2021 1:51:18 PM PDT by dsc (...let us run with perseverance the race marked out for us...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]


To: dsc
Everybody has been using the PCR, not full-bore, time-consuming, expensive sequencing.

Except in this case, where the CDC did sequencing, as you can see from their report.

110 posted on 08/28/2021 4:25:39 PM PDT by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson