Barnes knows better than this. Nothing in federal law requires EUAs to be revoked in this situation. Absolutely nothing. He can’t cite a case or statute that requires it either.Criteria for Issuance of Authorization. Read it for any of the shots at the link below, and one of the criteria for the EUA to be authorized is that "C. There is no adequate, approved, and available alternative to the emergency use of [Moderna] COVID-19 Vaccine to prevent COVID-19.^5". If Pfizer is now officially approved, and it's obviously pretty widespread everywhere, then there is no legal justification for the FDA to issue these letters, and therefore they should be revoked.
Unless, of course, they admit that Pfizer isn't adequate, or doesn't actually prevent COVID-19. But that would destroy their shot mandate narrative!
https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/covid-19-vaccines
You are missing an important part of 360bbb-3.
You can’t cut out a line from a statute and ignore the operative language.
See if you can find it.