The article is from July of last year.
The first paragraph is the abstract, the rest is the paper.
Skip down to the paragraph that starts with "There was something strange about the Alter study," to see where the problems began with her XMRV research. This started in 2009, ten years before Covid.
WildHighlander57
It was last year when Plandemic came out. After watching Plandemic my instinct was she was deliberately misleading. Looking up the details on the Italian Flu season and if I remember right, a study by the Air Force on infectious diseases I realize she was lying by omission, misdirection, and making deniable implications constantly.
There have been a few articles over the last few days talking about Mikovits. People on both sides have been condition to have a Pavlovian response to look any potential bias and assume all the content is biased one way or another. When comes to Covid, a lot of people on this site are looking for bias confirmation more than trying to understand what they don't know.
This is a professionally written paper, yes it gets a few digs in on Trump in the intro. When you get to part about the research fraud then it gets interesting.