This article poses some excellent questions!
Consider the following questions:
Is it really more plausible that the media are acting separately but identically or that they are colluding among themselves and with the Democrats and the Deep State? That their simultaneous and identical takes on everything are just due to similar viewpoints and not highly coordinated messages of the day?
Is it possible that the media have maintained and expanded their editorial bias over time without firm top-directed orders? Or would an uncontrolled system be expected to act like a pendulum, swinging back and forth?
Is it really plausible that the left/globalists capture organizations and institutions at will without a master plan and an extensive system of carrots and sticks? It just happens. Or is it more likely that there is a central authority choreographing it all and compelling submission?
Was it ever more plausible that the virus came about accidentally from a wet market with no evidence that such action could occur, when right down the street was a lab where we know that such viruses were studied?
Is it really plausible that nations around the world keep ratcheting up the tyranny as they independently determine it to be the best course of action? Or does it seem much more likely that each is part of a larger plan, sequenced for maximum effect?
Is it really more plausible that the American people never get what they want from their leaders because they are bad at picking them or that there really is no choice because elections are compromised and much of the nation’s leadership is either corrupt or being blackmailed and threatened?
Is it really probable that significant numbers of leaders take positions on issues they know are unpopular with their own constituents due to conviction and principles, however flawed? Or is it at least as likely that they are told to do so and know that that they will be taken care of if they lose their positions? Why is it that on the important issues, especially immigration, the path of least resistance for the politicians is always to betray the people?
Does anyone believe that five states independently and without consultation decided to stop counting votes at about the same time on election night?
Is it really plausible that bad people are always more clever and harder-working than the rest or that they often get promoted and taken care of in their field by unseen power brokers?
Is it really plausible that the vast majority of national elected officials, including the least impressive, have built great personal wealth during public service without extensive help and a rigged system? Or is it more likely that they have certain privileges now that they are part of the club?
Is it really possible that an adversarial movement would maintain almost flawless unanimity and discipline — guided only by common goals? Not even small differences on goals? No disagreement on methods? No visible internecine conflict and only the rarest public personality clashes? Or is it more likely that the rigid purpose and execution are maintained through extensive bribery and, when necessary, highly organized fear and punishment?
The point is that huge conspiracy is not just being further supported by recent revelations; it is becoming the only reasonable explanation for the milieu in which we find ourselves.
RE: Is it really more plausible that the media are acting separately but identically or that they are colluding among themselves and with the Democrats and the Deep State?
When Rush Limbaugh was still alive, in 1999, GW Bush announced that he was going to run for President and before Christmas of that year, he chose Dick Cheney to be his VP running mate.
Now W was just a few years as governor of Texas with not much foreign policy experience while Cheney was already by then, a 4 term Congressman, White House Chief of Staff and Defense Secretary under W’s father as well as CEO of Halliburton, one of the largest oil services companies in the USA.
Rush played several clips of newscasters from different channels repeating the mantra that George W. Lacked GRAVITAS, that’s why he had to choose an experienced man like Cheney.
In every clip, the words “he needed gravitas” was being repeated by mainstream media reporters as if it was ON SCRIPT.
Rush, in his typical parody style, then started to play a parody song to the tune of the Christmas song FELIZ NAVIDAD, with the words changed to HE NEEDS GRAVITAS, sang by someone who actually sounded like Jose Feliciano.
It was then that I began to realize that a single script was being written by a group of writers and distributed to various networks for them to parrot. Yes, it looked like a conspiracy then, and I don’t hesitate to say it is.