and
"No purified samples of the Covid-19 virus exist."
-----------------
These claims are half right. There was no sample available for that one test at that time. The virus had already been found and isolated in a lab. It simply took time to get samples to other labs and for other labs to isolated it.
This is using one source of information selectively while ignoring others.
The document "CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel" was first published on Feb 4, 2020.
From the National Center for Biotechnology Information, one of the early studies to isolate Covid: Identification of Coronavirus Isolated from a Patient in Korea with COVID-19, Feb 11, 2020.
It took time to isolate and distribute the virus, and emergency procedures are emergency procedures, last resort, not the preferred method. Again, this was a early emergency procedurea and the CDC admitted all the problems this one procedure had up front. It did not mean that doctors were required to use ONLY this one test either.
So did that document, when there was not much to go on, prevent anyone from later on isolating the virus afterwards?
There are 280 PCR tests. Are you claiming that problems with one are binding on all others that came afterwards?
What is your basis to say that a lack of a reference sample makes the test entirely useless, as well as all other tests that came later?
So it’s a monkey virus, but that monkey virus, its DNA, it sequences, were injected in polio vaccines, in MMR vaccines, in FLU vaccines, and they ‘ve been in that cell line since the mid 90’s.
So just like Dr. David Martin was saying, it’s only just a bunch of sequences, and this is what PCR detects is sequences of virus particle buds, it buds literally out of the cell of the host.
Next, the PCR has been demonstrated to test fruit, Coca Cola and Spanish water 'positive' for Covid. Recently, some school children tested ORANGE JUICE and found it had Covid too. The President of Tanzania had motor oil tested, but motor oil's PCR was inconclusive.
The WHO got creative and listed a portion of the human genome as reference sequence. That way every human being can potentially test positive for Covid if the swab picks up their genetic material. Good thinking, eh?
IT.IS.FAKE. The claims there are no isolated samples STILL are 100% correct. Pushing "we fixed it" doesn't make it so.
Had there BEEN isolated samples, the PCR is still not the correct test. Even Faucie admitted the tests are run at such high cycle rates, the results are meaningless with the presence of tiny fragments of what was once unrelated viral and cellular components, incapable of causing disease but part of natural immune function. FAUCI admitted it. Why is it possible for you people to admit the tests are worthless but a few days later declare it never happened?
Don't you wonder why the CDC has rule that PCR tests for vaccinated people will be run at lower cycle rates than PCR tests for unvaccinated people? It lowers the false positive rate and falsifies 'vaccine' efficacy.
The PCR is an ASSAY and the inventor correctly noted that by design it is unsuited to diagnose ANY DISEASE. It detects materials present in quantities too small to impact human health and it 'amplifies it' so it can be studied.
Pfizer excluded thousands of sick people from its 'efficicacy calculations' using fake PCR tests. That is, you can see the people ARE SICK but then you 'get' to ignore the failure of the vaccine by claiming test results from a test that doesn't measure anything, and is meaningless, somehow came out 95% in favor of your billion dollar product.
What is your basis to say that a lack of a reference sample makes the test entirely useless, as well as all other tests that came later?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The PCR 'assay' is looking for a match between its reference sample and something in a swab sample. Since it does not have a reference sample of the PCR, it cannot find a unique match but instead finds sequences of material in many, many products, including other coronaviruses, goats, kiwi, papppaya and Coca Cola. ALL 280 tests lack the capacity to identify COVID>